Posts for oracle-l, 12-2005
Browse: Last Month: 11-2005 Main Archive Page Next Month: 01-2006
- » DBMS_METADATA to extract triggers -
- » RE: DBMS_STORAGE_MAP and file mapping libraries -
- » RE: Cluster file systems versus raw devices in Oracle RAC -
- » Re: Project Raptor early adapter version released -
- » Re: STATSPACK - Rollback per transaction % -
- » Re: Project Raptor early adapter version released -
- » Re: Project Raptor early adapter version released -
- » RE: Project Raptor early adapter version released -
- » RE: Project Raptor early adapter version released -
- » RE: Project Raptor early adapter version released -
- » RE: Project Raptor early adapter version released -
- » Re: Project Raptor early adapter version released -
- » RE: Project Raptor early adapter version released -
- » Re: SQL help: delete recs based on count -
- » Re: Project Raptor early adapter version released -
- » Re: Project Raptor early adapter version released -
- » Re: undo segments online causing performance problems. -
- » RE: Project Raptor early adapter version released -
- » Re: Project Raptor early adapter version released -
- » Re: DBMS_STORAGE_MAP and file mapping libraries -
- » RE: Cluster file systems versus raw devices in Oracle RAC -
- » Re: undo segments online causing performance problems. -
- » RE: SQL help: delete recs based on count -
- » Re: SQL help: delete recs based on count -
- » RE: DBMS_STORAGE_MAP and file mapping libraries -
- » RE: oracle-l Digest V2 #373 -
- » SQL help: delete recs based on count -
- » RE: Cluster file systems versus raw devices in Oracle RAC -
- » Re: Cluster file systems versus raw devices in Oracle RAC -
- » Re: Saving Backup Errros inside the db -
- » Error - Segmentation fault in malloc_common.extend_brk, on AIX - Off-Topic -
- » RE: Cluster file systems versus raw devices in Oracle RAC -
- » RE: undo segments online causing performance problems. -
- » Re: undo segments online causing performance problems. -
- » Re: undo segments online causing performance problems. -
- » Re: undo segments online causing performance problems. -
- » Re: undo segments online causing performance problems. -
- » Re: undo segments online causing performance problems. -
- » Re: Cluster file systems versus raw devices in Oracle RAC -
- » Project Raptor early adapter version released -
- » Re: Cluster file systems versus raw devices in Oracle RAC -
- » Re: undo segments online causing performance problems. -
- » undo segments online causing performance problems. -
- » Re: Cluster file systems versus raw devices in Oracle RAC -
- » Re: Cluster file systems versus raw devices in Oracle RAC -
- » Re: Cluster file systems versus raw devices in Oracle RAC -
- » RE: Cluster file systems versus raw devices in Oracle RAC -
- » Re: Cluster file systems versus raw devices in Oracle RAC -
- » RE: STATSPACK - Rollback per transaction % -
- » RE: migrating from OEM 9.2 to Grid Control -
- » Re: STATSPACK - Rollback per transaction % -
- » Re: 10053 trace for sql fired from pl/sql (stored code) -
- » RE: materialized view ON COMMIT REFRESH - 942 error -
- » RE: Cluster file systems versus raw devices in Oracle RAC -
- » Re: Cluster file systems versus raw devices in Oracle RAC -
- » Re: STATSPACK - Rollback per transaction % -
- » migrating from OEM 9.2 to Grid Control -
- » RE: materialized view ON COMMIT REFRESH - 942 error -
- » RE: 10053 trace for sql fired from pl/sql (stored code) -
- » materialized view ON COMMIT REFRESH - 942 error -
- » RE: Cluster file systems versus raw devices in Oracle RAC -
- » RE: 10053 trace for sql fired from pl/sql (stored code) -
- » RE: 10053 trace for sql fired from pl/sql (stored code) -
- » RE: STATSPACK - Rollback per transaction % -
- » Re: 10053 trace for sql fired from pl/sql (stored code) -
- » RE: 10053 trace for sql fired from pl/sql (stored code) -
- » Re: 10053 trace for sql fired from pl/sql (stored code) -
- » Re: 10053 trace for sql fired from pl/sql (stored code) -
- » Re: STATSPACK - Rollback per transaction % -
- » RE: STATSPACK - Rollback per transaction % -
- » Re: 10053 trace for sql fired from pl/sql (stored code) -
- » CA Oracle Productivity Pack? - OT -
- » STATSPACK - Rollback per transaction % -
- » Re: How to find process memory consumption on HP-UX 11.11 ? -
- » RE: How to find process memory consumption on HP-UX 11.11 ? -
- » How to find process memory consumption on HP-UX 11.11 ? -
- » RE: Saving Backup Errros inside the db -
- » Re: Saving Backup Errros inside the db -
- » Re: Cluster file systems versus raw devices in Oracle RAC -
- » Re: Saving Backup Errros inside the db -
- » Saving Backup Errros inside the db -
- » RE: 10053 trace for sql fired from pl/sql (stored code) -
- » RE: Cluster file systems versus raw devices in Oracle RAC -
- » Re: CPU speed comparison -
- » Re: Unable to really switch undo tablespace -
- » Re: unspeficied event in top 5 timed event. -
- » RE: STATSPACK - Rollback per transaction % -
- » RE: 10053 trace for sql fired from pl/sql (stored code) -
- » Re: Cluster file systems versus raw devices in Oracle RAC -
- » Re: find file_id or block_id from data block address -
- » Re: DB Slow down -
- » RE: find file_id or block_id from data block address -
- » RE: find file_id or block_id from data block address -
- » RE: Cluster file systems versus raw devices in Oracle RAC -
- » Re: DB Slow down -
- » Re: Cluster file systems versus raw devices in Oracle RAC -
- » Re: Scalability fo Batch Operations in RAC -
- » RE: Scalability fo Batch Operations in RAC -
- » Re: find file_id or block_id from data block address -
- » Re: Scalability fo Batch Operations in RAC -
- » Cluster file systems versus raw devices in Oracle RAC -
- » RE: Scalability fo Batch Operations in RAC -
- » Scalability fo Batch Operations in RAC -
- » Re: number of transaction per row. -
- » number of transaction per row. -
- » Re: DB Slow down -
- » unspeficied event in top 5 timed event. -
- » DB Slow down -
- » Re: Unable to really switch undo tablespace -
- » Re: changing archive from noarchive -
- » Re: backup of offline dropped datafile -
- » Re: changing archive from noarchive -
- » Re: LAN N/w thruput, Basic Qs - Off-Topic -
- » Re: LAN N/w thruput, Basic Qs - Off-Topic -
- » Re: 10053 trace for sql fired from pl/sql (stored code) -
- » Re: TX wait on I_OBJ# and C_OBJ# -
- » Re: 10053 trace for sql fired from pl/sql (stored code) -
- » Re: CPU speed comparison -
- » Re: TX wait on I_OBJ# and C_OBJ# -
- » Re: TX wait on I_OBJ# and C_OBJ# -
- » Re: TX wait on I_OBJ# and C_OBJ# -
- » RE: TX wait on I_OBJ# and C_OBJ# -
- » Re: LAN N/w thruput, Basic Qs - Off-Topic -
- » Re: changing archive from noarchive -
- » Re: rman policy -
- » Re: LAN N/w thruput, Basic Qs - Off-Topic -
- » Re: LAN N/w thruput, Basic Qs - Off-Topic -
- » Re: CPU speed comparison -
- » Re: LAN N/w thruput, Basic Qs - Off-Topic -
- » Re: rman policy -
- » Re: DBMS_STORAGE_MAP and file mapping libraries -
- » TX wait on I_OBJ# and C_OBJ# -
- » DBMS_STORAGE_MAP and file mapping libraries -
- » Re: CPU speed comparison -
- » Re: backup of offline dropped datafile -
- » Re: CPU speed comparison -
- » Re: backup of offline dropped datafile -
- » Re: 10053 trace for sql fired from pl/sql (stored code) -
- » Re: 10053 trace for sql fired from pl/sql (stored code) -
- » Re: 10053 trace for sql fired from pl/sql (stored code) -
- » Re: 10053 trace for sql fired from pl/sql (stored code) -
- » Re: rman policy -
- » Re: backup of offline dropped datafile -
- » Re: rman policy -
- » CPU speed comparison -
- » Re: LAN N/w thruput, Basic Qs - Off-Topic -
- » rman policy -
- » RE: 10053 trace for sql fired from pl/sql (stored code) -
- » Re: backup of offline dropped datafile -
- » Re: changing archive from noarchive -
- » Re: 10053 trace for sql fired from pl/sql (stored code) -
- » backup of offline dropped datafile -
- » Re: 10053 trace for sql fired from pl/sql (stored code) -
- » Re: LAN N/w thruput, Basic Qs - Off-Topic -
- » Re: error gathering statistics on less than 100 % -
- » RE: changing archive from noarchive -
- » Re: changing archive from noarchive -
- » changing archive from noarchive -
- » RE: Split Blocks on Instance Crash, different issue for OS HW/SW failure in crash -
- » Re: Split Blocks on Instance Crash -
- » Re: 10053 trace for sql fired from pl/sql (stored code) -
- » LAN N/w thruput, Basic Qs - Off-Topic -
- » Re: error gathering statistics on less than 100 % -
- » Re: 10053 trace for sql fired from pl/sql (stored code) -
- » Re: 10053 trace for sql fired from pl/sql (stored code) -
- » Re: 10053 trace for sql fired from pl/sql (stored code) -
- » Re: 10053 trace for sql fired from pl/sql (stored code) -
- » Re: 10053 trace for sql fired from pl/sql (stored code) -
- » Re: 10053 trace for sql fired from pl/sql (stored code) -
- » Re: 10053 trace for sql fired from pl/sql (stored code) -
- » Re: 10053 trace for sql fired from pl/sql (stored code) -
- » Re: 10053 trace for sql fired from pl/sql (stored code) -
- » Re: 10053 trace for sql fired from pl/sql (stored code) -
- » Re: 10053 trace for sql fired from pl/sql (stored code) -
- » RE: 10053 trace for sql fired from pl/sql (stored code) -
- » Re: 10053 trace for sql fired from pl/sql (stored code) -
- » Re: export a windows database from linux -
- » Re: 10053 trace for sql fired from pl/sql (stored code) -
- » Re: 10053 trace for sql fired from pl/sql (stored code) -
- » Re: 10053 trace for sql fired from pl/sql (stored code) -
- » error gathering statistics on less than 100 % -
- » Re: export a windows database from linux -
- » Re: Split Blocks on Instance Crash -
- » Re: find file_id or block_id from data block address -
- » Re: Split Blocks on Instance Crash -
- » Re: 10053 trace for sql fired from pl/sql (stored code) -
- » Re: 10053 trace for sql fired from pl/sql (stored code) -
- » Re: 10053 trace for sql fired from pl/sql (stored code) -
- » Re: Split Blocks on Instance Crash -
- » Re: Split Blocks on Instance Crash -
- » 10053 trace for sql fired from pl/sql (stored code) -
- » RE: export a windows database from linux -
- » RE: Split Blocks on Instance Crash -
- » export a windows database from linux -
- » Re: Split Blocks on Instance Crash -
- » find file_id or block_id from data block address -
- » Re: Split Blocks on Instance Crash -
- » Re: Split Blocks on Instance Crash -
- » STATSPACK - Rollback per transaction % -
- » Re: Split Blocks on Instance Crash -
- » Split Blocks on Instance Crash -
- » solaris patchesets 11/11 and later -
- » Re: Oracle crashes on Windows shutdown -
- » Re: total cursor open currently -
- » Re: total cursor open currently -
- » Re: total cursor open currently -
- » Re: total cursor open currently -
- » RE: Oracle crashes on Windows shutdown -
- » Re: HMP support in 10g RAC -
- » Re: total cursor open currently -
- » total cursor open currently -
- » RE: Oracle 10g RAC installation -
- » Re: Oracle 10g RAC installation -
- » Re: HMP support in 10g RAC -
- » Re: Oracle crashes on Windows shutdown -
- » RE: Oracle crashes on Windows shutdown -
- » Re: Oracle crashes on Windows shutdown -
- » HMP support in 10g RAC -
- » Re: Unable to really switch undo tablespace -
- » Oracle crashes on Windows shutdown -
- » RE: Oracle 10g RAC installation -
- » Re: Oracle 10g RAC installation -
- » Re: Unable to really switch undo tablespace -
- » RE: Oracle 10g RAC installation -
- » RE: Oracle 10g RAC installation -
- » RE: Oracle 10g RAC installation -
- » RE: Oracle 10g RAC installation -
- » RE: Oracle 10g RAC installation -
- » Re: SQL Server 2005 Review -
- » Re: Unable to really switch undo tablespace -
- » Re: Unable to really switch undo tablespace -
- » Re: Unable to really switch undo tablespace -
- » Re: Unable to really switch undo tablespace -
- » Unable to really switch undo tablespace -
- » Re: Oracle pricing changes -
- » Re: Oracle 10g RAC installation -
- » Re: Oracle 10g RAC installation -
- » Re: Oracle 10g RAC installation -
- » Re: Oracle pricing changes -
- » RE: Oracle pricing changes -
- » Re: Oracle pricing changes -
- » Re: Oracle 10g RAC installation -
- » Oracle 10g RAC installation -
- » Re: did you notice that the 10.1 lin_x86 binaries mask username/password in the process table? -
- » did you notice that the 10.1 lin_x86 binaries mask username/password in the process table? -
- » Oracle pricing changes -
- » RE: frequently used procs -
- » Subscribe oracle_l -
- » EVA8000's using CA and ASM mirroring -
- » unsubscribe -
- » RE: SQL trace for specific database user -
- » frequently used procs -
- » Re: Metalink new interface -
- » Re: Metalink new interface -
- » Re: Oracle Linux IO Tunning - filesystemio_options- disk_asynch_io - PAGECACHE - aio-max-size - O_DIRECT -
- » Re: Metalink new interface -
- » Re: RE: OT: Redhat linux install issues -
- » Re: RE: OT: Redhat linux install issues -
- » Re: OT: Redhat linux install issues -
- » Oracle Linux IO Tunning - filesystemio_options- disk_asynch_io - PAGECACHE - aio-max-size - O_DIRECT -
- » Re: Metalink new interface -
- » RE: OT: Redhat linux install issues -
- » Re: Metalink new interface -
- » RE: Metalink new interface -
- » RE: Metalink new interface -
- » Re: Metalink new interface -
- » RE: Stats not gathered on all tables with GATHER_STATS_JOB in 10g -
- » Re: OT: Redhat linux install issues -
- » Re: Metalink new interface -
- » Re: OT: Redhat linux install issues -
- » RE: Metalink new interface -
- » Re: Metalink new interface -
- » Re: Metalink new interface -
- » Re: Metalink new interface -
- » Metalink new interface -
- » OT: Redhat linux install issues -
- » test -- sorry new email address (EOM) -
- » Re: Stats not gathered on all tables with GATHER_STATS_JOB in 10g -
- » Re: Stats not gathered on all tables with GATHER_STATS_JOB in 10g -
- » Re: Remote procedure call via DBMS_PIPE/AQ/whatever -
- » RE: RAC on extended distance clusteres -
- » RE: RAC on extended distance clusteres -
- » Re: pga_aggregate_target -
- » Re: pga_aggregate_target -
- » Re: pga_aggregate_target -
- » Re: v$sql 'db block changes' -
- » Re: import not picking up table from dmp file -
- » Large Pool and ORA-04031 -
- » Re: Stats not gathered on all tables with GATHER_STATS_JOB in 10g -
- » Re: Stats not gathered on all tables with GATHER_STATS_JOB in 10g -
- » RE: why does a higher cost run faster? -
- » Re: SQL trace for specific database user -
- » Re: import not picking up table from dmp file -
- » RE: import not picking up table from dmp file -
- » Re: import not picking up table from dmp file -
- » Re: import not picking up table from dmp file -
- » Re: Stats not gathered on all tables with GATHER_STATS_JOB in 10g -
- » Re: import not picking up table from dmp file -
- » Stats not gathered on all tables with GATHER_STATS_JOB in 10g -
- » import not picking up table from dmp file -
- » RE: SQL trace for specific database user -
- » Re: SQL trace for specific database user -
- » SQL trace for specific database user -
- » what perms ami missing -
- » Re: datatype LONG in different tablespace ? -
- » datatype LONG in different tablespace ? -
- » RE: v$sql 'db block changes' -
- » RE: optimizer_index_caching question -
- » optimizer_index_caching question -
- » RE: ora-04020 - Solution -
- » Re: Remote procedure call via DBMS_PIPE/AQ/whatever -
- » Re: v$sql 'db block changes' -
- » RE: v$sql 'db block changes' -
- » Re: DBMS_METADATA to get dependent DDL--solved -
- » Re: why does a higher cost run faster? -
- » Fw: ora-04020 -
- » Re: why does a higher cost run faster? -
- » RE: why does a higher cost run faster? -
- » Re: DBMS_METADATA to get dependent DDL -
- » Re: why does a higher cost run faster? -
- » Re: DBMS_METADATA to get dependent DDL -
- » Re: V10.2.0 (SE) database creation from dbca script(s) -
- » DBMS_METADATA to get dependent DDL -
- » Re: V10.2.0 (SE) database creation from dbca script(s) -
- » Re: why does a higher cost run faster? -
- » Re: why does a higher cost run faster? -
- » Re: V10.2.0 (SE) database creation from dbca script(s) -
- » RE: Designer 9.0.2.0 -
- » RE: v$sql 'db block changes' -
- » Re: v$sql 'db block changes' -
- » Re: V10.2.0 (SE) database creation from dbca script(s) -
- » why does a higher cost run faster? -
- » Function Based indexes in 10g - setting up function based indexes -
- » RE: v$sql 'db block changes' -
- » Re: v$sql 'db block changes' -
- » RE: v$sql 'db block changes' -
- » ora-04020 -
- » Re: v$sql 'db block changes' -
- » RE: v$sql 'db block changes' -
- » Re: v$sql 'db block changes' -
- » RE: 9i OO4O/OLEDB connections randomly failing when using Oracle Names -
- » RE: v$sql 'db block changes' -
- » Re: v$sql 'db block changes' -
- » Re: Designer 9.0.2.0 -
- » Re: Lets load test -
- » Re: 9i OO4O/OLEDB connections randomly failing when using Oracle Names -
- » v$sql 'db block changes' -
- » RE: Errors while creating datafile on remote nfs mount -
- » RE: IBM FlashCopy -
- » Re: Errors while creating datafile on remote nfs mount -
- » Errors while creating datafile on remote nfs mount -
- » Re: V10.2.0 (SE) database creation from dbca script(s) -
- » RE: Lets load test -
- » Re: Lets load test -
- » RE: Lets load test -
- » RE: IBM FlashCopy -
- » OEM Export - Specify NLS -
- » Re: Lets load test -
- » Re: Can't I mine DDL statements from LogMiner? -
- » V10.2.0 (SE) database creation from dbca script(s) -
- » IBM FlashCopy -
- » Re: Simulate AWR like repository in 9i -
- » Re: Lets load test -
- » Re: Lets load test -
- » RE: Lets load test -
- » RE: SQL Server 2005 Review -
- » Re: Lets load test -
- » RE: Lets load test -
- » Re: SQL Server 2005 Review -
- » Re: Lets load test -
- » RE: can't open database after restore -
- » RE: export error for duh Gurus -
- » Lets load test -
- » can't open database after restore -
- » RE: SQL Server 2005 Review -
- » RE: replication -
- » Re: BITMAP CONVERSION FROM/TO ROWID -
- » OWB : how to share directories between production and test. -
- » (no subject) -
- » Re: replication -
- » BITMAP CONVERSION FROM/TO ROWID -
- » RE: Can't I mine DDL statements from LogMiner? -
- » Re: Can't I mine DDL statements from LogMiner? -
- » Re: Can't I mine DDL statements from LogMiner? -
- » Re: RAC on extended distance clusteres -
- » RE: Can't I mine DDL statements from LogMiner? -
- » RE: Can't I mine DDL statements from LogMiner? -
- » RE: Can't I mine DDL statements from LogMiner? -
- » RE: Can't I mine DDL statements from LogMiner? -
- » RMAN Myths -
- » Can't I mine DDL statements from LogMiner? -
- » RE: export error for duh Gurus -
- » Re: Simulate AWR like repository in 9i -
- » RE: export error for duh Gurus -
- » replication -
- » SQL Server 2005 Review -
- » RE: RAC on extended distance clusteres -
- » RE: Simulate AWR like repository in 9i -
- » RE: export error for duh Gurus -
- » Re: DBMS_STATS.GATHER_SYSTEM_STATS samples only BADSTATS -
- » export error for duh Gurus -
- » Re: DBMS_STATS.GATHER_SYSTEM_STATS samples only BADSTATS -
- » RE: RAC on extended distance clusteres -
- » RE: RAC on extended distance clusteres -
- » RE: RAC on extended distance clusteres -
- » Re: RAC on extended distance clusteres -
- » RE: RAC on extended distance clusteres -
- » RE: rman incomplete recovery -
- » RE: rman incomplete recovery -
- » rman incomplete recovery -
- » RAC on extended distance clusteres -
- » Simulate AWR like repository in 9i -
- » Remote procedure call via DBMS_PIPE/AQ/whatever -
- » Re: Way to create large block size under LINUX for ORACLE dataabase?? -
- » RE: Way to create large block size under LINUX for ORACLE dataabase?? -
- » RE: Way to create large block size under LINUX for ORACLE dataabase?? -
- » Re: Way to create large block size under LINUX for ORACLE dataabase?? -
- » Re: Way to create large block size under LINUX for ORACLE dataabase?? -
- » Re: pga_aggregate_target -
- » pga_aggregate_target -
- » Re: Re[2]: Instead of SUM() I require MULTIPLY -
- » Re: Way to create large block size under LINUX for ORACLE dataabase?? -
- » Rman & standby db creation- LSM errors -
- » Re: DBMS_STATS.GATHER_SYSTEM_STATS samples only BADSTATS -
- » Re: DBMS_STATS.GATHER_SYSTEM_STATS samples only BADSTATS -
- » Re: Reading from a ref cursor in PL/SQL -- How can I ? -
- » Reading from a ref cursor in PL/SQL -- How can I ? -
- » Re: Dell-Oracle-Linux: Anyone else run this...because its not working for us! -
- » Re: Basic Sqlldr question -
- » Re: Basic Sqlldr question -
- » RE: 32 bit oracle standby running on 64 bit linux -
- » RE: Dell-Oracle-Linux: Anyone else run this...because its not working for us! -
- » Re: Dell-Oracle-Linux: Anyone else run this...because its not working for us! -
- » Re: Basic Sqlldr question -
- » RE: Way to create large block size under LINUX for ORACLE dataabase?? -
- » Re: when to create a virutal ilndex -
- » when to create a virutal ilndex -
- » Re: Dell-Oracle-Linux: Anyone else run this...because its not working for us! -
- » Re: Dell-Oracle-Linux: Anyone else run this...because its not working for us! -
- » Re: Dell-Oracle-Linux: Anyone else run this...because its not working for us! -
- » RE: Re[2]: Instead of SUM() I require MULTIPLY -
- » RE: Re[2]: Instead of SUM() I require MULTIPLY -
- » RE: Re[2]: Instead of SUM() I require MULTIPLY -
- » Re: Re[2]: Instead of SUM() I require MULTIPLY -
- » RE: Re[2]: Instead of SUM() I require MULTIPLY -
- » Re: Re[2]: Instead of SUM() I require MULTIPLY -
- » RE: DLL PATH NOT FOUND -
- » Re: Re[2]: Instead of SUM() I require MULTIPLY -
- » Fwd: Re[2]: Instead of SUM() I require MULTIPLY -
- » RE: Instead of SUM() I require MULTIPLY -
- » RE: Instead of SUM() I require MULTIPLY -
- » Re: Instead of SUM() I require MULTIPLY -
- » Re: RAC Re: Load balancing -
- » Re: event based scheduling and queues -
- » Re: Instead of SUM() I require MULTIPLY -
- » Re: Instead of SUM() I require MULTIPLY -
- » Instead of SUM() I require MULTIPLY -
- » RE: Dell-Oracle-Linux: Anyone else run this...because its not working for us! -
- » RE: DLL PATH NOT FOUND -
- » Re: event based scheduling and queues -
- » Re: Question on SERVERERROR trigger -
- » Re: Dell-Oracle-Linux: Anyone else run this...because its not working for us! -
- » Re: event based scheduling and queues -
- » RE: Dell-Oracle-Linux: Anyone else run this...because its not working for us! -
- » event based scheduling and queues -
- » DLL PATH NOT FOUND -
- » RE: Dell-Oracle-Linux: Anyone else run this...because its not working for us! -
- » RE: Dell-Oracle-Linux: Anyone else run this...because its not working for us! -
- » Re: Dell-Oracle-Linux: Anyone else run this...because its not working for us! -
- » Way to create large block size under LINUX for ORACLE dataabase?? -
- » RE: CR blocks visited -
- » Re: SQL*Loader Date error (ORA-01858) -
- » Re: Basic Sqlldr question -
- » 32 bit oracle standby running on 64 bit linux -
- » CR blocks visited -
- » Re: Oracle 9.2 Standard Edition - Standby switchover issues -
- » Re: PLSQL beginners question -
- » ORA-600 [26599] creating java BLOB class -
- » Re: RAC Re: Load balancing -
- » Re: Load balancing -
- » Re: PLSQL beginners question -
- » Re: Load balancing -
- » Load balancing -
- » Basic Sqlldr question -
- » Re: PLSQL beginners question -
- » PLSQL beginners question -
- » Re: rman 9204 duplicating from host a to host b using tsm as backup layer -
- » Re: When stats trash your performance -
- » US-Anywhere: Oracle Apps DBA - Job # SB11510 -
- » RE: Dell-Oracle-Linux: Anyone else run this...because its not working for us! -
- » RE: Dell-Oracle-Linux: Anyone else run this...because its not working for us! -
- » RE: Dell-Oracle-Linux: Anyone else run this...because its not working for us! -
- » RE: Dell-Oracle-Linux: Anyone else run this...because its not working for us! -
- » RE: When stats trash your performance -
- » RE: SQL*Loader Date error (ORA-01858) -
- » RE: system tablespace's extend -
- » RE: Reference material recommendations -
- » RE: Function based indexes? -
- » RE: Simple Recovery Question -
- » RE: SQL*Loader Date error (ORA-01858) -
- » Re: Reference material recommendations -
- » Reference material recommendations -
- » Re: 10gR2 and _simple_view_merging issue -
- » Re: Any way to do this in straight SQL? -
- » Re: system tablespace's extend -
- » Re: system tablespace's extend -
- » Re: 10gR2 and _simple_view_merging issue -
- » RE: Simple Recovery Question -
- » system tablespace's extend -
- » Re: Simple Recovery Question -
- » RE: Multiple child cursors with no difference in v$sql_shared_cursor, causing invalid statspack results -
- » RE: Multiple child cursors with no difference in v$sql_shared_cursor, causing invalid statspack results -
- » Multiple child cursors with no difference in v$sql_shared_cursor, causing invalid statspack results -
- » RE: alter system set user_dump_dest='/newdir' not working -
- » Re: Any way to do this in straight SQL? -
- » Re: alter system set user_dump_dest='/newdir' not working -
- » alter system set user_dump_dest='/newdir' not working -
- » Re: When stats trash your performance -
- » Re: When stats trash your performance -
- » Re: When stats trash your performance -
- » RE: When stats trash your performance -
- » Re: Any way to do this in straight SQL? -
- » Re: When stats trash your performance -
- » DBMS_STATS.GATHER_SYSTEM_STATS samples only BADSTATS -
- » Any way to do this in straight SQL? -
- » Re: Oracle 9.2 Standard Edition - Standby switchover issues -
- » Re: When stats trash your performance -
- » RE: When stats trash your performance (third school of thought) -
- » RE: RMAN error on level0 backup after controlfile recovery to new server -
- » RE: SQL*Loader Date error (ORA-01858) -
- » RE: RMAN error on level0 backup after controlfile recovery to new server -
- » RE: RMAN error on level0 backup after controlfile recovery to new server -
- » RE: RMAN error on level0 backup after controlfile recovery to new server -
- » RMAN error on level0 backup after controlfile recovery to new server -
- » RE: When stats trash your performance -
- » RE: When stats trash your performance -
- » RE: When stats trash your performance -
- » RE: When stats trash your performance -
- » RE: Question on SERVERERROR trigger -
- » When stats trash your performance -
- » ssh tunneling -
- » SQL*Loader Date error (ORA-01858) -
- » RE: 9i OO4O/OLEDB connections randomly failing when using Oracle Names -
- » RE: 10g AWR question -
- » 10gR2 and _simple_view_merging issue -
- » Re: Oracle 9.2 Standard Edition - Standby switchover issues -
- » Re: Oracle 9.2 Standard Edition - Standby switchover issues -
- » Re: Oracle 9.2 Standard Edition - Standby switchover issues -
- » 10g AWR question -
- » RE: Can IP addresses be audited in Oracle -
- » Re: Oracle 9.2 Standard Edition - Standby switchover issues -
- » Re: Oracle 9.2 Standard Edition - Standby switchover issues -
- » Re: Oracle 9.2 Standard Edition - Standby switchover issues -
- » Re: SQL*Net message from client -
- » Re: Oracle 9.2 Standard Edition - Standby switchover issues -
- » 9i OO4O/OLEDB connections randomly failing when using Oracle Names -
- » Designer 9.0.2.0 -
- » Oracle 9.2 Standard Edition - Standby switchover issues -
- » Re: Database & Oracle Reports 10g - passing large param lists -
- » Re: Can IP addresses be audited in Oracle -
- » RE: Primary DB on Windows 2000 and Standby on Win2003 -
- » rman 9204 duplicating from host a to host b using tsm as backup layer -
- » RE: Function based indexes? -
- » Re: Primary DB on Windows 2000 and Standby on Win2003 -
- » Simple Recovery Question -
- » RE: Function based indexes? -
- » RE: Function based indexes? -
- » Re: Function based indexes? -
- » Re: How about just open one node of RAC in read write mode, others in read only mode? -
- » RE: Function based indexes? -
- » Is the list up ? -
- » UNSUBSCRIBE -
- » User last "altered" date -
- » RE: Function based indexes? -
- » RE: Function based indexes? -
- » RE: Function based indexes? -
- » RE: Function based indexes? -
- » Re: Install grid control -
- » Primary DB on Windows 2000 and Standby on Win2003 -
- » Question on SERVERERROR trigger -
- » Re: SQL*Net message from client -
- » Re: 9.2.6 Patch for Oracle -
- » Re: Function based indexes? -
- » Re: RAID Groups and ASM - I've got a problem, I think -
- » RE: Function based indexes? -
- » Re: Function based indexes? -
- » Function based indexes? -
- » RE: How about just open one node of RAC in read write mode, others in read only mode? -
- » How about just open one node of RAC in read write mode, others in read only mode? -
- » Re: RAID Groups and ASM - I've got a problem, I think -
- » Re: RAID Groups and ASM - I've got a problem, I think -
- » RE: Bug regarding logical standby -
- » RE: extracting xml tag name -
- » Re: 9.2.6 Patch for Oracle -
- » Re: Is anybody running 10g on VMWare? -
- » 9.2.6 Patch for Oracle -
- » RE: truncate ORA-01552 -
- » RE: RAID Groups and ASM - I've got a problem, I think -
- » RE: truncate ORA-01552 -
- » standby / dataguard issue -
- » RE: truncate ORA-01552 -
- » RAID Groups and ASM - I've got a problem, I think -
- » RE: UTL_SMTP - Multiple Recipients -
- » RE: UTL_SMTP - Multiple Recipients -
- » RE: UTL_SMTP - Multiple Recipients -
- » RE: UTL_SMTP - Multiple Recipients -
- » RE: extracting xml tag name -
- » Re: UTL_SMTP - Multiple Recipients -
- » Re: Moving 350 meg lob takes nearly 4 gigs -
- » RE: truncate ORA-01552 -
- » Re: CBO - hash join vs nested loops -
- » RE: truncate ORA-01552 -
- » RE: truncate ORA-01552 -
- » RE: CBO - hash join vs nested loops -
- » Re: CBO - hash join vs nested loops -
- » UTL_SMTP - Multiple Recipients -
- » Re: advanced replication -
- » RE: Is anybody running 10g on VMWare? -
- » RE: Is anybody running 10g on VMWare? -
- » Re: 10gR2 Cloning and database control -
- » UTL_SMTP - Multiple Recipients -
- » RE: CBO - hash join vs nested loops -
- » truncate ORA-01552 -
- » Re: CBO - hash join vs nested loops -
- » Re: CBO - hash join vs nested loops -
- » Re: This shouldn't be this tough... -
- » Re: This shouldn't be this tough... -
- » RE: CBO - hash join vs nested loops -
- » RE: Is anybody running 10g on VMWare? -
- » Re: Is anybody running 10g on VMWare? -
- » Is anybody running 10g on VMWare? -
- » Re: CBO - hash join vs nested loops -
- » RE: CBO - hash join vs nested loops -
- » Re: extracting xml tag name -
- » extracting xml tag name -
- » reboot -f broken -
- » Re: SQL*Net message from client -
- » Re: advanced replication -
- » SQL*Net message from client -
- » Re: CBO - hash join vs nested loops -
- » Re: CBO - hash join vs nested loops -
- » Re: CBO - hash join vs nested loops -
- » Re: FW: auto start of listener with pwd -
- » Re: Does anyone run test win vs. linux and can share how muchfaster islinux than windows, please? -
- » This shouldn't be this tough... -
- » RE: advanced replication -
- » * Oracle DBA with light SAP Basis Skills Needed- Contract to Perm Position -
- » RE: 10gR2 Cloning and database control -
- » Re: 10gR2 Cloning and database control -
- » Re: Error creating listener on new RAC node -
- » RE: advanced replication -
- » Re: Query to check schema sys privs -
- » Re: oracle 9.2.0.1 -
- » oracle 9.2.0.1 -
- » RE: Error when running RMAN duplicate -
- » Re: CBO - hash join vs nested loops -
- » RE: Query to check schema sys privs -
- » Re: CBO - hash join vs nested loops -
- » Query to check schema sys privs -
- » Re: CBO - hash join vs nested loops -
- » Re: Moving 350 meg lob takes nearly 4 gigs -
- » RE: CBO - hash join vs nested loops -
- » Re: CBO - hash join vs nested loops -
- » Re: Error creating listener on new RAC node -
- » Re: CBO - hash join vs nested loops -
- » Re: event 10079 question -
- » RE: object names in 10046 trace -
- » Re: Temporary table vs pl\sql table -
- » FW: auto start of listener with pwd -
- » Re: Error creating listener on new RAC node -
- » Re: Bug regarding logical standby -
- » RE: CBO - hash join vs nested loops -
- » RE: advanced replication -
- » Re: Error creating listener on new RAC node -
- » Re: advanced replication -
- » advanced replication -
- » CBO - hash join vs nested loops -
- » Re: Error creating listener on new RAC node -
- » Re: Error creating listener on new RAC node -
- » RE: ORA-00955: name is already used by an existing object -
- » RE: ORA-00955: name is already used by an existing object -
- » ORA-00955: name is already used by an existing object -
- » Re: Temporary table vs pl\sql table -
- » Re: 10gR2 Cloning and database control -
- » Re: 10gR2 Cloning and database control -
- » RE: 10gR2 Cloning and database control -
- » 10gR2 Cloning and database control -
- » RE: Bug regarding logical standby -
- » Re: event 10079 question -
- » RE: Can IP addresses be audited in Oracle -
- » Re: auto start of listener with pwd -
- » Error when running RMAN duplicate -
- » RE: Error creating listener on new RAC node -
- » Re: A simple PL/SQL procedure -
- » RE: auto start of listener with pwd -
- » object names in 10046 trace -
- » Error creating listener on new RAC node -
- » RE: auto start of listener with pwd -
- » Re: Heck of a time with NLS -
- » Re: event 10079 question -
- » Re: event 10079 question -
- » Heck of a time with NLS -
- » RE: event 10079 question -
- » RE: auto start of listener with pwd -
- » RE: event 10079 question -
- » RE: event 10079 question -
- » RE: auto start of listener with pwd -
- » RE: auto start of listener with pwd -
- » auto start of listener with pwd -
- » event 10079 question -
- » RE: Can IP addresses be audited in Oracle -
- » Moving 350 meg lob takes nearly 4 gigs -
- » RE: Can IP addresses be audited in Oracle -
- » RE: Can IP addresses be audited in Oracle -
- » Re: Bug regarding logical standby -
- » Bug regarding logical standby -
- » Re: Can IP addresses be audited in Oracle -
- » Re: Easy RMAN question -
- » * Oracle/ SAP DBA Needed in Chicago area.. -
- » Re: Easy RMAN question -
- » Easy RMAN question -
- » Re: A simple PL/SQL procedure -
- » Re: Temporary table vs pl\sql table -
- » Re: Can IP addresses be audited in Oracle -
- » Re: CPU time -
- » Urgent - IMP-0008 , IMP-0051 errors during import -