RE: Cluster file systems versus raw devices in Oracle RAC
- From: Hemant K Chitale <hkchital@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: kevinc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx, <oracle-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 30 Dec 2005 23:12:49 +0800
Have you seen/implemented EFSCG for Oracle databases ?
At 03:51 AM Friday, Kevin Closson wrote:
If you want a single file
served by multiple scalable NAS heads without
replication overhead, you have to use the EFS.CG. It is the
only product out there that does it.
I found the HP gateway with
Google pretty quickly:
http://h18006.www1.hp.com/products/storageworks/efs/
- On 12/29/05, Kevin Closson
< kevinc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
wrote:
- what does "NFS of
CFS" mean? Exporting a CFS? Yeah, that's
- being done. It's called the StorageWorks Enterprise File Server
Clustered Gateway
- by HP. Up to 16 nodes of scalable NFS with transparent NFS client
failover in the
- event a NAS head should fail. And when I say transparent, I mean it.
Oracle
- CRS, and database processes have no idea that the NAS head serviing
up their
- files has died. Not exactly the typical filer experience. Yeah,
I know you can "cluster"
- and replicate filers. The HP EFS/CG requires no replication for this
high availability/
- scalability. Want to know how I know ?
-
-
Hemant K Chitale
http://web.singnet.com.sg/~hkchital
--
http://www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-l
- References:
- RE: Cluster file systems versus raw devices in Oracle RAC
- From: Kevin Closson
Other related posts:
- » Cluster file systems versus raw devices in Oracle RAC
- » Re: Cluster file systems versus raw devices in Oracle RAC
- » RE: Cluster file systems versus raw devices in Oracle RAC
- » Re: Cluster file systems versus raw devices in Oracle RAC
- » RE: Cluster file systems versus raw devices in Oracle RAC
- » Re: Cluster file systems versus raw devices in Oracle RAC
- » RE: Cluster file systems versus raw devices in Oracle RAC
- » Re: Cluster file systems versus raw devices in Oracle RAC
- » RE: Cluster file systems versus raw devices in Oracle RAC
- » Re: Cluster file systems versus raw devices in Oracle RAC
- » RE: Cluster file systems versus raw devices in Oracle RAC
- » Re: Cluster file systems versus raw devices in Oracle RAC
- » Re: Cluster file systems versus raw devices in Oracle RAC
- » Re: Cluster file systems versus raw devices in Oracle RAC
- » Re: Cluster file systems versus raw devices in Oracle RAC
- » Re: Cluster file systems versus raw devices in Oracle RAC
- » RE: Cluster file systems versus raw devices in Oracle RAC
- » Re: Cluster file systems versus raw devices in Oracle RAC
- » RE: Cluster file systems versus raw devices in Oracle RAC
- » RE: Cluster file systems versus raw devices in Oracle RAC
- » RE: Cluster file systems versus raw devices in Oracle RAC
If you want a single file served by multiple scalable NAS heads without
replication overhead, you have to use the EFS.CG. It is the
only product out there that does it.
I found the HP gateway with Google pretty quickly:
http://h18006.www1.hp.com/products/storageworks/efs/
- On 12/29/05, Kevin Closson
< kevinc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
wrote:
- what does "NFS of
CFS" mean? Exporting a CFS? Yeah, that's
- being done. It's called the StorageWorks Enterprise File Server Clustered Gateway
- by HP. Up to 16 nodes of scalable NFS with transparent NFS client failover in the
- event a NAS head should fail. And when I say transparent, I mean it. Oracle
- CRS, and database processes have no idea that the NAS head serviing up their
- files has died. Not exactly the typical filer experience. Yeah, I know you can "cluster"
- and replicate filers. The HP EFS/CG requires no replication for this high availability/
- scalability. Want to know how I know ?
- being done. It's called the StorageWorks Enterprise File Server Clustered Gateway
- what does "NFS of
CFS" mean? Exporting a CFS? Yeah, that's
- RE: Cluster file systems versus raw devices in Oracle RAC
- From: Kevin Closson