Re: SQL Server 2005 Review
- From: Peter Barnett <regdba@xxxxxxxxx>
- To: jkstill@xxxxxxxxx, Oracle-L Freelists <oracle-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 21 Dec 2005 07:19:35 -0800 (PST)
Jared,
I have been to a couple of SQL Server 2005
presentations by Microsoft lately. Invariably, they
steer the discussion away from the database and toward
their ETL tools. They frequently highlighted the
interoperability of these tools with the other major
database products.
It seems that they are intentionally not talking about
the 'new and improved' SQL Server. Higher maintenance
and reduced automation might well be reasons that they
would raher talk about their ETL tools.
Happy holidays.
--- Jared Still <jkstill@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Here is an interesting review of SQL Server 2005 by
> EWeek.
> Seems to be quite objective.
>
> http://www.eweek.com/article2/0,1895,1896097,00.asp
>
> One of the more interesting bits from an Oracle
> perspective:
>
> However, by making management more complex,
> Microsoft has discarded the
> one significant advantage it had over Oracle
> Database 10g and IBM's
> DB2?ease
> of administration. This makes DB2 and Oracle
> Database 10g look all the
> more
> attractive for their broader choice of
> development frameworks, management
>
> interfaces, and server hardware and operating
> systems.
>
> Some of us might find that somewhat ironic.
>
> --
> Jared Still
> Certifiable Oracle DBA and Part Time Perl Evangelist
>
Pete Barnett
Lead Database Administrator
The Regence Group
pnbarne@xxxxxxxxxxx
__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
http://mail.yahoo.com
--
http://www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-l
- References:
- SQL Server 2005 Review
- From: Jared Still
Other related posts:
- » SQL Server 2005 Review
- » RE: SQL Server 2005 Review
- » Re: SQL Server 2005 Review
- » RE: SQL Server 2005 Review
- » Re: SQL Server 2005 Review
- SQL Server 2005 Review
- From: Jared Still