RE: Cluster file systems versus raw devices in Oracle RAC

From: "Kevin Closson" <kevinc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: <oracle-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 28 Dec 2005 21:43:05 -0800

sometimes man bites dog
 
:-)
 
 
 


________________________________

        From: oracle-l-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx 
[mailto:oracle-l-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of rjamya
        Sent: Wednesday, December 28, 2005 6:40 PM
        To: tanel.poder.003@xxxxxxx
        Cc: ORACLE-L
        Subject: Re: Cluster file systems versus raw devices in Oracle RAC
        
        
        We are licensed for all rdbms products/options. We can use them 
whenever ... so that helps.
        
        Rjamya
        
        
        On 12/28/05, Tanel Põder < tanel.poder.003@xxxxxxx 
<mailto:tanel.poder.003@xxxxxxx> > wrote: 


                Kevin is right, as much as I've seen none of the site licenses 
have had RAC 
                included, most of my customers have even had to pay for 
partitioning extra
                (although discounted) price.

Follow-Ups:

Re: Cluster file systems versus raw devices in Oracle RAC
From: Maimon Oded

Re: Cluster file systems versus raw devices in Oracle RAC
From: rjamya

RE: Cluster file systems versus raw devices in Oracle RAC

Other related posts: