RE: RAC on extended distance clusteres

From: Carel-Jan Engel <cjpengel.dbalert@xxxxxxxxx>
To: bthomas@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Date: Tue, 13 Dec 2005 20:57:23 +0100

Bryan,

I know you're quoting, it's probably not completely *your* opinion.
I guess I missed an important announcement. 
When did Oracle start to support 'full rolling upgrades'?
AFAIK, that's pretty much non-existent

Best regards,

Carel-Jan Engel

===
If you think education is expensive, try ignorance. (Derek Bok)
===
On Tue, 2005-12-13 at 12:43 -0600, Bryan Thomas wrote:

> Here is a quote from an internal Oracle Metalink article:
> 
> <SNIP>
> RAC and Data Guard combined does provide more comprehensive protections not
> covered by RAC on Extended Distance Clusters alone. This includes protection
> against corruptions, users errors (in 9i), protection against regional
> disasters, and support for full rolling upgrades across Oracle versions.

Follow-Ups:

Re: RAC on extended distance clusteres
From: Mark Bole

References:
- RE: RAC on extended distance clusteres
  - From: Pete Sharman
- RE: RAC on extended distance clusteres
  - From: Bryan Thomas

RE: RAC on extended distance clusteres

Other related posts: