Re: RAC on extended distance clusteres
- From: Ray Stell <stellr@xxxxxxxxxx>
- To: Pete Sharman <peter.sharman@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 13 Dec 2005 12:56:14 -0500
On Wed, Dec 14, 2005 at 04:09:07AM +1100, Pete Sharman wrote:
> It seems people try to use this as a cheap way to provide DR and HA in one
> foul swoop.
Forgive the non-techie aside, I had never heard the foul ref before,
though it is reported to be in common usage. So, what you're saying is
that RAC for DR purposes is a "Paddy Martin?"
http://www.worldwidewords.org/qa/qa-fel1.htm
"All my pretty ones?
Did you say all? O hell-kite! All?
What, all my pretty chickens and their dam
At one fell swoop?"
http://www.anu.edu.au/andc/ozwords/October_96/6._betty.htm
"...one fell swoop has now been Betty Martined to 'at (orin) one foul swoop
because
the meaning of fell has largely been lost."
http://dictionary.reference.com/search?q=one+foul+swoop
--
http://www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-l
- Follow-Ups:
- RE: RAC on extended distance clusteres
- From: Pete Sharman
- References:
- RAC on extended distance clusteres
- From: The Human Fly
- RE: RAC on extended distance clusteres
- From: Pete Sharman
Other related posts:
- » RAC on extended distance clusteres
- » RE: RAC on extended distance clusteres
- » Re: RAC on extended distance clusteres
- » RE: RAC on extended distance clusteres
- » RE: RAC on extended distance clusteres
- » RE: RAC on extended distance clusteres
- » RE: RAC on extended distance clusteres
- » Re: RAC on extended distance clusteres
- » RE: RAC on extended distance clusteres
- » RE: RAC on extended distance clusteres
- RE: RAC on extended distance clusteres
- From: Pete Sharman
- RAC on extended distance clusteres
- From: The Human Fly
- RE: RAC on extended distance clusteres
- From: Pete Sharman