RE: SQL Server 2005 Review
- From: "Goulet, Dick" <DGoulet@xxxxxxxx>
- To: <post.ethan@xxxxxxxxx>, <ineyman@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 14 Dec 2005 12:00:24 -0500
Now I would not call that OT. In many cases it's dead on.
_____
From: oracle-l-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:oracle-l-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Ethan Post
Sent: Wednesday, December 14, 2005 11:27 AM
To: ineyman@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Cc: jkstill@xxxxxxxxx; Oracle-L Freelists
Subject: Re: SQL Server 2005 Review
A little off topic here but I found this illustration of the software
development life cycle to be pretty amusing.
http://openlexicon.org/xwiki/bin/view/lexicon/FAQ
<http://openlexicon.org/xwiki/bin/view/lexicon/FAQ>
On 12/14/05, Igor Neyman <ineyman@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Isn't it only natural, that complex systems are trying to get
simpler, while simple systems are trying to get more complex,
encroaching on each other territory?
Thanks Jared, good article.
Igor
Other related posts:
