Re: Cluster file systems versus raw devices in Oracle RAC
- From: Maimon Oded <oded.maimon@xxxxxxxxx>
- To: kevinc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Thu, 29 Dec 2005 20:42:32 +0200
i don't know what is StorageWorks Enterprise File Server Clustered Gateway,
i was talking about something like NETAPP storage.
On 12/29/05, Kevin Closson <kevinc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> what does "NFS of CFS" mean? Exporting a CFS? Yeah, that's
> being done. It's called the StorageWorks Enterprise File Server Clustered
> Gateway
> by HP. Up to 16 nodes of scalable NFS with transparent NFS client failover
> in the
> event a NAS head should fail. And when I say transparent, I mean it.
> Oracle
> CRS, and database processes have no idea that the NAS head serviing up
> their
> files has died. Not exactly the typical filer experience. Yeah, I know
> you can "cluster"
> and replicate filers. The HP EFS/CG requires no replication for this high
> availability/
> scalability. Want to know how I know ?
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
> *From:* oracle-l-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:
> oracle-l-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] *On Behalf Of *Maimon Oded
> *Sent:* Thursday, December 29, 2005 1:16 AM
> *To:* oracle-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> *Subject:* Re: Cluster file systems versus raw devices in Oracle RAC
>
> i know some companies that have RAC in site license. but let's change the
> discussion to something else.
>
> NFS of CFS?
>
> On 12/29/05, Kevin Closson <kevinc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> > sometimes man bites dog
> >
> > :-)
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > ------------------------------
> > *From:* oracle-l-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:oracle-l-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > ] *On Behalf Of *rjamya
> > *Sent:* Wednesday, December 28, 2005 6:40 PM
> > *To:* tanel.poder.003@xxxxxxx
> > *Cc:* ORACLE-L
> > *Subject:* Re: Cluster file systems versus raw devices in Oracle RAC
> >
> >
> > We are licensed for all rdbms products/options. We can use them
> > whenever ... so that helps.
> >
> > Rjamya
> >
> > On 12/28/05, Tanel Põder < tanel.poder.003@xxxxxxx> wrote:
> > >
> > >
> > > Kevin is right, as much as I've seen none of the site licenses have
> > > had RAC
> > > included, most of my customers have even had to pay for partitioning
> > > extra
> > > (although discounted) price.
> > >
> > >
> >
>
- References:
- RE: Cluster file systems versus raw devices in Oracle RAC
- From: Kevin Closson
Other related posts:
- » Cluster file systems versus raw devices in Oracle RAC
- » Re: Cluster file systems versus raw devices in Oracle RAC
- » RE: Cluster file systems versus raw devices in Oracle RAC
- » Re: Cluster file systems versus raw devices in Oracle RAC
- » RE: Cluster file systems versus raw devices in Oracle RAC
- » Re: Cluster file systems versus raw devices in Oracle RAC
- » RE: Cluster file systems versus raw devices in Oracle RAC
- » Re: Cluster file systems versus raw devices in Oracle RAC
- » RE: Cluster file systems versus raw devices in Oracle RAC
- » Re: Cluster file systems versus raw devices in Oracle RAC
- » RE: Cluster file systems versus raw devices in Oracle RAC
- » Re: Cluster file systems versus raw devices in Oracle RAC
- » Re: Cluster file systems versus raw devices in Oracle RAC
- » Re: Cluster file systems versus raw devices in Oracle RAC
- » Re: Cluster file systems versus raw devices in Oracle RAC
- » Re: Cluster file systems versus raw devices in Oracle RAC
- » RE: Cluster file systems versus raw devices in Oracle RAC
- » Re: Cluster file systems versus raw devices in Oracle RAC
- » RE: Cluster file systems versus raw devices in Oracle RAC
- » RE: Cluster file systems versus raw devices in Oracle RAC
- » RE: Cluster file systems versus raw devices in Oracle RAC
- RE: Cluster file systems versus raw devices in Oracle RAC
- From: Kevin Closson