I apologise in advance if this email seems a bit too harsh, but it does convey a very important fact. Haiku is not a Democracy - it will not satisfy the *wishes* of its community, no matter how noble they may be and how popular the opinions are. Haiku is an Autocracy - the CORE developers (you know, the guys who slave away during the evenings, weekends, who sacrifice a lot of things to make Haiku happen) have the final say in what features will be developed, when Haiku will be released, etc. The only way members of the community can influence the decisions of the Autocracy is to actually roll up their sleeves and through hard work become a CORE developer. Subvert from within, so to speak :) Having said all that, Haiku release schedules happen whenever the core developers say so. Any other discussion about schedules is a waste of electrons - including this post :) Cheers. On Wed, Oct 14, 2009 at 8:37 AM, Gabriele Biffi <mlist@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Nick wrote: > >> > > Release cycle should be every 6 months (+ or - 1 month). >> > > >> > >> > Release cycles should be 5 months, 7 months, 5 months..... >> > ;) >> >> Or they could also be 7 months, 5 months, 7 months, etc. :-) >> But seriously, a 6 month release cycle would be optimal & ideal. >> > > No, it should be "it's ready when it's ready" :-) > > Seriously, I hate those Linux distros that releases every few months with > little changes but that changes everything. I prefer a 1 year release cycle > so people have time to get tired and willing to see new things. > > Regards, > > Gabriele - www.biffuz.it > > >