Nick <tonestone57@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > Nick <tonestone57@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > ... > > > But seriously, a > > [snip ;] > > > 6 month release cycle would be optimal & ideal. > > > > Optimal depends a lot on the work that has to be done > > in each window between releases. Major changes need > > time to break the system and patch it back up again. ... > You're right Jonas. I actually meant optimal in the sense > that it'll keep momentum going with Haiku. I agree with you from that point of view. Having something new and hopefully better to offer regularly (without breaking with the previous) is definitely a good way to keep people interested. Both users and developers. The too short release cycle thing is a problem I heard about from the OpenBSD developers, IIRC with regards to extensive changes to its VFS. /Jonas.