Craig Birkmaier wrote: >At 10:55 AM -0400 5/17/05, John Shutt wrote: > > >>Craig, >> >>Yes, I am certain. No, 100% of the fee does not subsidize Freeview >>directly. But it does maintain the transmission structure. It also >>subsidizes the 5 BBC video channels in the multiplex. I don't know if the >>independent stations and the other offerings such as ABC 1 get a free ride >>or if they pay for carriage. But the backbone of the system was built and >>is maintained by those license fees. >> >>I will gladly admit my error if I am proven wrong. (Wouldn't be the first >>time, not by a long shot.) >> >>Without the mandated license fees, then you would have to somehow tax >>individuals for the construction and maintenance of this transmission >>infrastructure that is currently done in the UK. By that definition, even >>the UK model is not what you call a "properly designed DTV infrastructure" >>since it is not self supporting any more than the U.S. Interstate system. >> >> >> > >There was a LARGE amount of money involved in the bidding for the >right to create Freeview. Not sure where this money went. And new >content providers are bidding up the cost to add their content to the >Freeview service. > >Bottom line, Freeview is fully capable of being self supporting, as >would a comparable system here in the U.S. or anywhere else in the >world for that matter. Don;t the commercials pay for Free TV? > >;-) > >Regards >Craig > > Commercials pay for the commercial stations and other stations are supported by the TV tax. I don't know what the mix was as to the capital needed to start Freeview but the ongoing cost is paid by commercials and the tax. Bob Miller ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can UNSUBSCRIBE from the OpenDTV list in two ways: - Using the UNSUBSCRIBE command in your user configuration settings at FreeLists.org - By sending a message to: opendtv-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with the word unsubscribe in the subject line.