[haiku] Re: Rethinking the Haiku Distro Guidelines
- From: "Axel Dörfler" <axeld@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: haiku@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Wed, 14 Oct 2009 08:25:30
Ingo Weinhold <ingo_weinhold@xxxxxx> wrote:
> On 2009-10-13 at 07:46:30 [+0800], Axel Dörfler <axeld@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > wrote:
> > Ryan Leavengood <leavengood@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > > 2. We do not want third parties releasing Haiku development code.
> > > If
> > > someone does this, it must strip away all relevant trademarks,
> > > logos,
> > > etc that would identify it as Haiku and it must clearly indicate
> > > it
> > > is
> > > based on unreleased code. Any other uses of Haiku code must follow
> > > these same rules.
> > While I'm currently preferring Jorge's idea to solve this issue
> > with
> > the trademark policies alone, if we wanted to go the full distance,
> > we
> > shouldn't brand our nightly builds as Haiku then, either, because
> > that
> > could be counted as a trademark usage policy violation, too. Not
> > that
> > we actually release them properly, but it's basically a similar
> > thing.
> I'm not opposed to having a different desktop wall paper indicating
> that
> that those are development versions. Anything else is pretty
> ridiculous,
> though.
If that's all we do, that could also be something we ask of those Haiku
"remixes", if they are otherwise compatible.
Bye,
Axel.
Other related posts:
