[haiku] Re: Rethinking the Haiku Distro Guidelines
- From: Ingo Weinhold <ingo_weinhold@xxxxxx>
- To: haiku@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Wed, 14 Oct 2009 11:07:28 +0800
On 2009-10-13 at 07:46:30 [+0800], Axel Dörfler <axeld@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
wrote:
> Ryan Leavengood <leavengood@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > 2. We do not want third parties releasing Haiku development code. If
> > someone does this, it must strip away all relevant trademarks, logos,
> > etc that would identify it as Haiku and it must clearly indicate it
> > is
> > based on unreleased code. Any other uses of Haiku code must follow
> > these same rules.
>
> While I'm currently preferring Jorge's idea to solve this issue with
> the trademark policies alone, if we wanted to go the full distance, we
> shouldn't brand our nightly builds as Haiku then, either, because that
> could be counted as a trademark usage policy violation, too. Not that
> we actually release them properly, but it's basically a similar thing.
I'm not opposed to having a different desktop wall paper indicating that
that those are development versions. Anything else is pretty ridiculous,
though.
CU, Ingo
Other related posts:
