Ingo Weinhold <bonefish@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On 2007-05-25 at 18:57:22 [+0200], Stephan Assmus <superstippi@xxxxxx > > > wrote: > > <http://www.yellowbites.com/stuff/HAIKU_COMPATIBLE_logo_01.png> > > <http://www.yellowbites.com/stuff/HAIKU_COMPATIBLE_logo_02.png> > > <http://www.yellowbites.com/stuff/HAIKU_COMPATIBLE_logo_03.png> > > <http://www.yellowbites.com/stuff/HAIKU_COMPATIBLE_logo_04.png> > > <http://www.yellowbites.com/stuff/HAIKU_COMPATIBLE_logo_05.png> > > <http://www.yellowbites.com/stuff/HAIKU_COMPATIBLE_logo_06.png> > > Critique welcome. > I like 2 best -- simple elegance. 6 and 5 have quite some charm, too, > though the colors might indeed be a bit aggressive. In number 3 the > contrast of the leaf is a bit too low, IMHO. While I think 3 looks best in itself, it's probably not a good candidate because of the low contrast; 1 is a bit too subtle and fine for a logo. I don't like the deviation of the leaf in no 6. And while the colors in 5 are indeed strong, it's actually my favourite (being the Haiku colors and all shiny). I am not sure if I like the rounded lower edges in 2, at least it looks a bit random. But a monochrome logo like this does look good, too. > Regarding the alignment of "compatible" in 1 - 3, Jan is right. > There're > two more pixels space to the left. I also agree, that the "HAIKU" > letter > spacing looks a bit weird. Absolutely :-) Bye, Axel.