On 22/05/07, Thom Holwerda <slakje@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Ehum, guys, aren't we overanalysing a bit here? 1) Take the existing Haiku logo. 2) Smash "compatible" underneath it in a font used in the Haiku project. 3) The end. I don't see why this is taking more than 2, maybe 3 emails. Thom Holwerda On May 22, 2007, at 8:36 PM, ar1000@xxxxxxx wrote: > Meanwhile, you are right The file that I uploaded wouldn't "size" > properly, but the text would be sized appropropriatly for use — > like a 16x16 icon vs a 512x512 icon (sizing vs. scaling). That > aside, the critique of your design is somewhat irrelevant to the > critique of mine (and vice versa) — we aren't comparing for a > choice until we have a set of final drafts that are competing, > until then, lets not compete, especially in critique. And, without > sounding rude, there are certain components of design that are > simply not taste, they are right or wrong. This is hard for a lot > of people to accept, but in the first couple of weeks of my design > education, everyone had to — its important for growth. That is not > to say that everything is that way, but proper use of type, > balance, composition, etc is right/wrong. Style, mood, and story > are up to "taste" to some degree though. > > - Austin > > On May 22, 2007, at 2:27 PM, Meanwhile - wrote: > >> >>> ----- Original Message ----- >>> From: ar1000@xxxxxxx >>> To: openbeos@xxxxxxxxxxxxx >>> Subject: [openbeos] Re: Haiku Compatible badge (again) >>> Date: Tue, 22 May 2007 14:07:49 -0400 >>> >>> >>> Meanwhile, >>> >>> I am going to provide critique because it seems as though you >>> prompted it, don't be upset or insulted, being detached is a very >>> important part of accepting critique. Design isn't art, it must be >>> able to stand without you standing with it. If you are a designer >>> or you already know a critique works, that disregard my warning, I >>> just don't want to come off as mean. >>> >>> I must say that I am not I fan. This artifact looks like a >>> signature you would find at the end of a forum post, not something >>> that would ship on a CD or be put on the about page of a website. >>> It isn't striking, is too difficult to read and is very, >>> "staccato" in feel — its not pleasant enough. Also, your use of >>> type doesn't convey a feeling that this badge should. Right now it >>> is saying "I am computer generated, and for some reason some of me >>> is K-on-W and some is W-on- K, also I am techie-ish". Also, its an >>> odd aspect ratio for a badge. >>> >>> - Austin >>> >>> >>> >>> On May 22, 2007, at 1:56 PM, Meanwhile - wrote: >>> >>>>> ----- Original Message ----- >>>>> From: "Meanwhile -" <meanwhile@xxxxxxxxxx> >>>>> To: openbeos@xxxxxxxxxxxxx >>>>> Subject: [openbeos] Haiku Compatible badge (again) >>>>> Date: Tue, 22 May 2007 20:36:38 +0800 >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Here's what I made of it: >>>>> >>>>> http://www.xs4all.nl/~rrvvww/HC/HaikuCompatibleX.png >>>>> >>>>> And some efforts that led to it: >>>>> >>>>> http://www.xs4all.nl/~rrvvww/HC/ >>>>> >>>>> -Meanwhile >>>>> >>>>> (Couldn't add this to the existing thread as that was already >>>>> removed from my inbox, sorry...) >>>> >>>> >>>> Latest and final version: >>>> >>>> http://www.xs4all.nl/~rrvvww/HC/HaikuCompatibleX3.png >>>> >>>> -Meanwhile >> >> >> Personal tastes aside, I just wanted to make a badge that doesn't >> take up more than a quarter of a CD box's >> surface, because your design doesn't let itself be scaled down >> without becoming illegible. >> >> -Meanwhile >> >> >> = >> >> >> -- >> Powered by Outblaze >> > >
clearly, that would not be the Haiku way. :) Euan