[pure-silver] Re: Under exposed frame

  • From: "Gene Johnson" <genej2@xxxxxxx>
  • To: <pure-silver@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Mon, 3 Jan 2005 08:05:23 -0800

If that's all you wanted, just burn a little with the 5 filter in that area.
Pretty much what Ryuji suggested.

Many ways to skin a cat.  But you can probably see a pattern emerging in all
this advice.


----- Original Message -----
From: "Justin F. Knotzke" <jknotzke@xxxxxxxxxx>
To: <pure-silver@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Monday, January 03, 2005 7:41 AM
Subject: [pure-silver] Re: Under exposed frame


> <quote who=Gene Johnson date=[03/01/05 09:36 AM]/>
> > I could print this pretty much straight up.  The exposure's not that bad
and
> > it's a nice scene. Your highlights and mids look fine.  The "problem"
shadow
> > areas are a black dress in shadow and the inside of a fireplace in
shadow.
> > I don't think there's much in those areas to get no matter what you do.
For
> > me, the hardest part is the face of the woman on the left.  Pre-flashing
> > might help get more detail there, but it might have an unwanted affect
on
> > your highlights.  i might dodge that area a "little".  Not much more
than
> > about 20% of the overall exposure time or it will get even muddier than
it
> > already is.  That alone might be enough depending on how fussy you want
to
> > be.
>
>      I find my scanner always seems to scan at a much higher exposure
> rate then I would like. I almost always have to crank down the exposure
> to .5 or .3 on vuescan. Otherwise, everything is just too bright.
>
>      But it amazes me that the scanner can pick this up no problem. Yet
> on a properly exposed contact print, any prints and even looking through
> a loupe, I can't really make out too much detail: everything is just too
> dark.
>
>      Also sorry to all if I confused everyone's approaches. As you can
> see I am rather new to anything other then a straight print. Straight
> printing I could do nothing with this frame. Everything was way too
> dark. If I printed it lighter, I couldn't get any blacks. I felt like I
> had no play in the print.
>
>      I don't much care for the girl on the left (my sister) I mean.. in
> the print, my sister is pretty cool.. ;-) I am mostly concerned with
> getting the middle girl's eyes. That's the frame for me. Then if I can
> get the highlights in the girl on the right's hair, I am off to the races.
>
>      But trying to get the girl in the middle properly exposed, her hair
> comes out gray when really it's black. If I try to get her hair a
> convincing black, her face is too dark.
>
>      So I am going to try flashing the paper and if that doesn't work
> try split printing as suggested here (not really the method I originally
> proposed).
>
>      Thanks again to everyone,
>
>      J
>
>
>
>
> --
> Justin F. Knotzke
> jknotzke@xxxxxxxxxx
> http://www.shampoo.ca
>
============================================================================
=================================
> To unsubscribe from this list, go to www.freelists.org and logon to your
account (the same e-mail address and password you set-up when you
subscribed,) and unsubscribe from there.
>


=============================================================================================================
To unsubscribe from this list, go to www.freelists.org and logon to your 
account (the same e-mail address and password you set-up when you subscribed,) 
and unsubscribe from there.

Other related posts: