[pure-silver] Re: Under exposed frame

  • From: Ryuji Suzuki <rs@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • To: pure-silver@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Date: Mon, 03 Jan 2005 09:36:17 -0500 (EST)

From: <genej2@xxxxxxx>
Subject: [pure-silver] Re: Under exposed frame
Date: Mon, 03 Jan 2005 08:49:04 -0500

> What you're describing here is split printing :)

What I recommended to him yesterday using two exposures is not split
printing. I even inserted a note saying that the similarily is only
superficial resemblance.

The procedure makes 2 exposures. One exposure is with normal contrast
filter for the image. It may be grade 2 or 3 or whatever suitable for
the image and the negative. Not with grade 0 or 00. Another exposure
is with the highest contrast filter, typically grade 5, but the
exposure is adjusted such that this second exposure does not affect
the contrast or density of the highlight and midtone. The role of the
second exposure is merely to increase the shadow contrast and density,
which is typically what you need with underexposed negatives.
--
Ryuji Suzuki
"Keep a good head and always carry a light camera."
=============================================================================================================
To unsubscribe from this list, go to www.freelists.org and logon to your 
account (the same e-mail address and password you set-up when you subscribed,) 
and unsubscribe from there.

Other related posts: