[Wittrs] Re: Understanding Dualism
- From: "iro3isdx" <xznwrjnk-evca@xxxxxxxxx>
- To: wittrsamr@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Wed, 01 Sep 2010 02:54:17 -0000
--- In Wittrs@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, "SWM" <SWMirsky@...> wrote:
> responding to http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Wittrs/message/6250
> SWM:
> I was making the point that if you define consciousness as
> needing intentionality and intentionality as what's needed to have
> consciousness you haven't taken us to any new understanding of the
> issue or given us a conclusion that was not already evident. For
> the argument to be of use, we need to learn something we didn't
> explicitly know before.
I surely don't know what you think you are replying to. It seems that
you must have completely misunderstood my post.
> SWM:
> What "critical" elements are left out and can you say why these
> ARE critical?
I already gave details in a previous post - the one that you seem to
have completely misunderstood.
I guess I'll stop posting in this thread to avoid further confusing the
issues.
Regards,
Neil
=========================================
Need Something? Check here: http://ludwig.squarespace.com/wittrslinks/
Other related posts:
