[Wittrs] Re: When is "brain talk" really dualism?
- From: "iro3isdx" <xznwrjnk-evca@xxxxxxxxx>
- To: Wittrs@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Fri, 14 Aug 2009 03:42:25 -0000
--- In Wittrs@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, Glen Sizemore <gmsizemore2@...> wrote:
> Neil: Why the need for all of this labeling?
> GS: Why the "need" to call a chair "chair"? The case of calling a
> dualist "dualist" is similar.
If every time I saw something that had a tinge of brown to its color, I
called that thing a chair, then I would have reduced the word "chair" to
meaninglessness.
I am suggesting that the way the word "dualist" is tossed around has the
effect of reducing that word to meaninglessness.
Regards,
Neil
Other related posts:
