[Wittrs] Re: When is "brain talk" really dualism?
- From: "Rajasekhar" <rgoteti@xxxxxxxxx>
- To: Wittrs@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Sun, 16 Aug 2009 06:11:42 -0000
>
> In some contexts that will make sense. "I took a hit of that hash and man,
> I'm really buzzed." I didn't decide to be buzzed, I decided to become buzzed
> by smoking the hash. So the hash or the smoking of it caused the feeling of
> being buzzed. Similarly, certain interventions in the brain by a doctor may
> alter one's feeling. So we can speak of physical causation re: minds and it
> is precisely because we can that we are confronted by this question of
> explaining the mind's relation to the brain.
>
> SWM
>
MANDAN MISRA said that phenomenal distinctions are unreal and appearance of
immutable word essence.
So the assumption of relation between brain and mind may be a myth,like cause
and its effect.Since cause is no way different from effect.
While playing with verbal images one must be cautious not to interrelate with
reality.
thank you
sekhar
Other related posts:
