On Wed, 2009-11-04 at 12:20 -0500, Ryan Leavengood wrote: > On Wed, Nov 4, 2009 at 10:37 AM, Eddy Groen <eddyspeeder@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > In closing, I do thank you for mentioning the list, because I have now also > > subscribed. I had hoped to be pointed to it a little earlier, as I suppose > > Johan does, too. So don't take it out on him, okay? > > Even as a long time member of the Haiku community I was only > peripherally aware of the openbeos-cdt list. Obviously it has > languished a bit since it still even has openbeos in the name. There > also hasn't been an email on since July 2007. In fact the whole > concept of a Creative Design Team (or any other "team") is pretty much > Haiku/OpenBeOS history at this point. > > Also I'm pretty sure there have been a lot of UI discussions on this > list and probably haiku-development too instead of openbeos-cdt for > the last few years. So I'm not quite sure if Jorge's suggestion is > correct, though I certainly see the motivation behind it since this > email thread has gotten extremely long (as usual of UI discussions > which are the definitive "bike shed" discussions.) I realize that precedents are not in favor of my argument; but if our website is going to state the following... "This is a general discussion list. Use this list if you do not find a list specific to the topic that you want to monitor or discuss." ...to describe this mailing list, then I don't think anyone can argue that a discussion titled "Suggestions to change double click on window title behaviour" clearly has its place in openbeos-cdt or even the Glass Elevator list. > So I wonder instead of using the defunct openbeos-cdt list, should a > new haiku-ui or haiku-design list be created? Or maybe freelists could > do us another favor and rename openbeos-cdt? What is wrong with using this list as is? Regards, Jorge/aka Koki