[geocentrism] Re: Evolution

  • From: "Jack Lewis" <jack.lewis@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • To: <geocentrism@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Fri, 21 Sep 2007 12:03:38 +0100

Dear Paul,
When is an argument merely gainsaying and when is it a spirited discussion?
Accepting that you do not want to respond to the rest of James' post, how about 
just addressing the comment he made in red?

  ----- Original Message ----- 
  From: Paul Deema 
  To: Geocentrism@xxxxxxxxxxxxx 
  Sent: Friday, September 21, 2007 7:53 AM
  Subject: [geocentrism] Re: Evolution

  J A 

  From j a Wed Sep 19 14:55:01 2007

    Calling something transitional, does not make it transitional. You are 
assuming it to be transitional because you can imagine how it could be and then 
you turn around and call it evidence to support your faith in evolution and 
this faith is what caused you to view it as transitional in the first place. A 
lovely little circle you've enslaved your mind with.

  I'm sorry to say this post from you is unnecessarily argumentative and 
confrontational. Worse, it includes an accusation that my position on the 
subject of evolution in particular -- and by implication -- science in general, 
can be equated to faith. I deny that now as I have previously, and as a result 
of this, I see nothing to be gained by addressing the remainder of this post.

  Paul D

  Sick of deleting your inbox? Yahoo!7 Mail has free unlimited storage. Get it 

Other related posts: