[geocentrism] Re: Evolution
- From: "Jack Lewis" <jack.lewis@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: <geocentrism@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 21 Sep 2007 12:03:38 +0100
Dear Paul,
When is an argument merely gainsaying and when is it a spirited discussion?
Accepting that you do not want to respond to the rest of James' post, how about
just addressing the comment he made in red?
Jack
----- Original Message -----
From: Paul Deema
To: Geocentrism@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Sent: Friday, September 21, 2007 7:53 AM
Subject: [geocentrism] Re: Evolution
J A
From j a Wed Sep 19 14:55:01 2007
Calling something transitional, does not make it transitional. You are
assuming it to be transitional because you can imagine how it could be and then
you turn around and call it evidence to support your faith in evolution and
this faith is what caused you to view it as transitional in the first place. A
lovely little circle you've enslaved your mind with.
I'm sorry to say this post from you is unnecessarily argumentative and
confrontational. Worse, it includes an accusation that my position on the
subject of evolution in particular -- and by implication -- science in general,
can be equated to faith. I deny that now as I have previously, and as a result
of this, I see nothing to be gained by addressing the remainder of this post.
Paul D
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Sick of deleting your inbox? Yahoo!7 Mail has free unlimited storage. Get it
now.
Other related posts:
