Dear Paul, This illustrates microevolution (variation within the same kind) not macroevolution (a kind becoming another kind). I have already told you this in a previous e-mail. What Darwinists say is that because we can see evolutionary variations within kinds then ergo it should be seen between kinds. This is wrong reasoning and their are no fossils to back up the assertion. Jack ----- Original Message ----- From: philip madsen To: geocentrism@xxxxxxxxxxxxx Sent: Tuesday, September 18, 2007 10:05 PM Subject: [geocentrism] Re: Evolution Finally, please do a search for "Apo A-I Milano". My search produced 319,000 hits, the first on my list being http://www.medicalnewstoday.com/articles/33816.php. Other sources I've seen indicate that all who carry this gene are descended from a single marriage about 400 years ago. If you do not subscribe to the concept of evolution, how would you explain this phenomenon? Paul D What has geaneology to do with evolution? The church has always recognised inbreeding as a danger, and forbids it .. Perhaps it is proof of devolution? Phil.