Arachne at FreeLists---The Arachne Fan Club! Hey Rob, I'm glad that your happy with Freedos. I don't have any of those problems that you had with DOS so I'm happy where I am. I appreciate the info about Freedos so I can better understand user problems with Arachne and maybe give better help. Thanks again for your feedback, Eric On Sat, 25 Nov 2006 10:16:53 -0600 (CST) robo13@xxxxxxxxxxx writes: > Arachne at FreeLists---The Arachne Fan Club! > > Hey Eric, > When I used DOS I kept trying to keep all added executables > in a sysutils directory, and keep my root directory clean. > I would get errors of like 'PATH nested too deep' or some > such. I never have to change my PATH in 'nix. There is > nothing disorganized about it. The dos/windows way of > long PATH statements or dumping everything in one directory > and so many apps wanting their directories in the root > directory became a PITA for me. I'm a software junkie and > now when I add an app I know where to find configs, executables > or libraries, they all have their place. It keeps a cleaner > drive. It's just a different way of doing things than the > traditional M$, dos/windows way of doing things. > IMO FreeDOS is considerably more advanced than the > older proprietary DOSs. > Rob > > On Sat, 25 Nov 2006, Eric S. Emerson wrote: > > > > Hi Rob, > > Lester already told me that Arachne > > is in d:\arc\ directory. So, I would expect to see > > at least that directory in the "path statement". > > > > Ie: path= d:\fdos\bin;d:\arc > > > > similar to the path statement you wrote: > > > >> /usr/local/bin:/usr/bin:/bin:/usr/X11R6/bin > > > > I was just trying to give an example. I was not > > telling him he had to copy my path. I was just > > suggesting that d:\arc\ should be in his path > > when he is running Arachne. That way batch files > > that he puts in d:\arc\, his main arachne directory, > > will be always accessible when he shells to dos > > and changes drives and/or directories. > > > > In DOS, many individual programs change the path > > statement when they are run and then return the > > original path statement when they are shut down. > > If he doesn't want d:\arc\ in his path all the time then > > a simple batch file, run when he starts Arachne, > > could add it to the path and remove it from the path > > when he shuts Arachne down. > > > > BTW, I have never seen a working DOS setup that > > only had one directory in it's path. That would mean > > that everything would have to be put into that directory > > to be globally accessible. That would be poor organization > > of files in my opinion. > > > > Eric > > > > On Fri, 24 Nov 2006 22:36:57 -0600 (CST) robo13@xxxxxxxxxxx > writes: > >> Arachne at FreeLists---The Arachne Fan Club! > >> > >> Hey Eric, > >> It's been awhile since I used FreeDOS, although I've > >> been meaning to try the new stable 1.0 version, but > >> just as m$dos uses c:\dos and DrDOS uses c:\drdos > >> and then additional programs have to keep adding to the > >> PATH statement, and directories scattershot all over the > >> system, FreeDOS touches on the 'nix system of keeping > >> things much more organized and everything in it's place. > >> You pretty much never put anything in the root directory. > >> this is my PATH statement in Slackware. > >> > >> /usr/local/bin:/usr/bin:/bin:/usr/X11R6/bin > >> > >> Each bin has different permissions. He could just put 'a.bat' > >> in d:\fdos\bin or more likely a somewhat similar executable. > >> Rob > >> > >> On Fri, 24 Nov 2006, Eric S. Emerson wrote: > >>> > >>> Hi Rob, > >>> I don't know 'nix or Freedos. > >>> I just know that looks nothing like what > >>> I get when I type PATH at the prompt and > >>> press ENTER. That looks to me like the > >>> path to his files in his "bin" directory. > >>> Does Freedos have a different way of > >>> displaying the path ? > >>> > >>> Eric > >>> > >>> On Fri, 24 Nov 2006 20:02:09 -0600 (CST) robo13@xxxxxxxxxxx > >> writes: > >>>> Arachne at FreeLists---The Arachne Fan Club! > >>>> > >>>> Eric, > >>>> I would say that is his PATH, if he is using FreeDOS. > >>>> FreeDOS has a fair bit of 'nix influence. > >>>> Rob > >>>> > >>>> On Fri, 24 Nov 2006, Eric S. Emerson wrote: > >>>>> > >>>>> Hi Lester, > >>>>> I learned that my path should always > >>>>> include: > >>>>> 1. The root directory of my boot drive which is > >>>>> always C: in all my computers. > >>>>> 2. The directory where all my DOS commands/utilities > >>>>> are stored. > >>>>> 3. The Arachne main directory if I am running Arachne. > >>>>> > >>>>> So that would be: path= c:\;c:dos;d:\arachne in my case. > >>>>> > >>>>> I may also sometimes add other directories if they > >>>>> contain programs/files that I want global access to. > >>>>> > >>>>> I don't know your computer setup so I can't really > >>>>> comment on your path.......except......... I am surprised > >>>>> that I don't see the Arachne main directory included. > >>>>> In fact, what you show below doesn't even look like > >>>>> your path. Your path is the line returned when you > >>>>> type PATH at a DOS prompt and press ENTER. > >>>>> > >>>>> Eric > >>>>> > >>>>> On Fri, 24 Nov 2006 04:15:15 -0500 "Lester" > >> <fd100@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> > >>>> writes: > >>>>>> Arachne at FreeLists---The Arachne Fan Club! > >>>>>> > >>>>>>> Eric: If you put CDA.BAT in your PATH, then you can use it > >> from > >>>> the > >>>>>> > >>>>>> command prompt when you're in DOS. There are many times that > I > >>>> want > >>>>>> to return to my Arachne main directory and do something > before > >> I > >>>>>> start up Arachne. > >>>>>> > >>>>>> Might be a good idea, I put it there. Btw, my path is: > >>>> d:\fdos\bin > > > > Arachne at FreeLists > > -- Arachne, The Premier GPL Web Browser/Suite for DOS -- > > > > > > > > -- > -----Pine Email on Slackware GNU/Linux----- > Arachne at FreeLists > -- Arachne, The Premier GPL Web Browser/Suite for DOS -- > > Arachne at FreeLists -- Arachne, The Premier GPL Web Browser/Suite for DOS --