And how how are you going to generate a paper curve without projecting something onto it so that it generates measurable print densities. robc At 14/01/2005 00:04 +0100, you wrote: >Hang on a second! >Yes, it is true, you can get a true grade 5 from color heads on many papers. >But, negative development has nothing to do with that. Paper contrast is >measured as a log exposure range of the paper. This is independent of the >negative, and consequently, not related to negative development. > > > > > >Regards > > > >Ralph W. Lambrecht > > > > > > > >On 1/13/05 11:46 PM, "Rob Champagne" <app@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > >> I think we agree on this. My point was merely to dispell the myth that it is >> not possible to get a true G5 with dichroic filtration and that with suitable >> neg development it is possible. Having done this if you then use an ilford MG >> filter G5 the resulting print contrast would be G5+ >> >> robc >> >> At 13/01/2005 14:01 -0800, you wrote: >> >>> ----- Original Message ----- >>> From: "Rob Champagne" <app@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> >>> To: <pure-silver@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> >>> Sent: Thursday, January 13, 2005 9:56 AM >>> Subject: [pure-silver] Re: New color head "discoveries" >>> >>> >>>> big snip >>>> >>>>> The filters of a color head will not give you the full >>>>> range of contrast available from VC paper with the use of >>>>> dedicated filters. They should give you a couple contrast >>>>> grades on either side of "normal" but filters should be >>>>> used >>>>> to obtain the maximum and minimum contrast values. >>>> >>>> big snip >>>> >>>>> --- >>>>> Richard Knoppow >>>> >>>> I wonder whether my observation is true for other dichroic >>>> filter head enlargers. >>>> The Ilford Y+M figures for grade 2 on my Durst CLS501 head >>>> enlarger give approx an ISO grade 1 result on paper. >>>> It occurs to me that because dichroic filtration does not >>>> seem to give as much contrast as filter sets, and because >>>> most new enlargers have dichroic heads, that Ilford, and >>>> maybe other manufacturers, use this to its advantage in >>>> terms of film speed. >>>> To get a true ISO grade 2 using ilfords G2 Y+M figures for >>>> my enlarger I have to give the negative more development >>>> which in turn gives allows a faster film speed. >>>> So what I'm speculating here is that modern film speeds >>>> may be tailored by the manufacturers to suit printing on >>>> dichroic heads with Y+M filtration. >>>> It should be noted that by using increased development of >>>> the negative the overall contrast obtainable from a >>>> dichroic is not far short of a true G5 and if you take neg >>>> development far enough then a true G5 is obtainable from a >>>> dichroic head. >>>> >>>> It all depends on what you are tailoring your development >>>> to. Do it to 0 filtration and your negs will be too soft >>>> for G5 on dichroic settings. Do it to G2 Y+M settings of >>>> your dichroic head and you will get faster film speed and >>>> availability of higher contrast in your print. >>>> >>> What are the other conditions of the comparison? Are the >>> filters being used in the same enlarger or a different >>> enlarger? What I am trying to get at is that if the filters >>> are being used in a condenser enlarger the difference in >>> contrast will be due to that. Color heads are very diffuse >>> sources. The type of light makes little or no difference to >>> the dye images of color but will change the silver image >>> film about one paper grade. >>> If the settings of the color head re right for the paper >>> it should exactly duplicate the contrast of a filter for >>> that grade. The limitation of the color head is that it may >>> not be able to reach the extremes of the contrast range of >>> the paper. This is normally of little consequence. >>> Since ISO film speed is measured at a fixed contrast >>> (about right for diffusion printing) a change in contrast >>> will result in a change of effective speed. changing the >>> contrast up or down about one paper grade will result in a >>> change in film speed of around 3/4 stop up or down. Changing >>> either film conrast or paper contrast should have exactly >>> the same effect on the print. >>> >>> --- >>> Richard Knoppow >>> Los Angeles, CA, USA >>> dickburk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx >>> >>> ============================================================================= >>> ================================ >>> To unsubscribe from this list, go to www.freelists.org and logon to your >>> account (the same e-mail address and password you set-up when you >>> subscribed,) and unsubscribe from there. >> >> ============================================================================== >> =============================== >> To unsubscribe from this list, go to www.freelists.org and logon to your >> account (the same e-mail address and password you set-up when you >> subscribed,) >> and unsubscribe from there. > > > >============================================================================================================= >To unsubscribe from this list, go to www.freelists.org and logon to your >account (the same e-mail address and password you set-up when you subscribed,) >and unsubscribe from there. ============================================================================================================= To unsubscribe from this list, go to www.freelists.org and logon to your account (the same e-mail address and password you set-up when you subscribed,) and unsubscribe from there.