[pure-silver] Re: New color head "discoveries"
- From: DarkroomMagic <info@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: PureSilverNew <pure-silver@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 14 Jan 2005 01:06:13 +0100
Rob
Print densities are generated by exposure, and for that, you need to project
nothing but light. However, to generate a paper characteristics curve, you
need controlled incremental light exposures. A step wedge does a good job at
that. Having 'no negative' could do the same thing, if you find a way to
control the exposure otherwise.
There is no need to have negatives to create paper curves, but there is a
need to have controlled exposure, which calibrated negatives can be used
for. Since there is no need to have a negative, negative development can not
play a role in paper contrast.
Of course, you can use negative development to make the negative density
range fit the paper exposure range. Nevertheless, paper contrast is a paper
characteristic and has nothing to do with negative development.
You can use any film, any developer, any development time or temperature. As
long as you create a step wedge from it that has incremental log densities
of 0.1 or 0.15, like the ones from Stouffer, they will all report the same
paper contrast as long as paper development is consistent.
Regards
Ralph W. Lambrecht
On 1/14/05 12:16 AM, "Rob Champagne" <app@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> And how how are you going to generate a paper curve without projecting
> something onto it so that it generates measurable print densities.
>
> robc
> At 14/01/2005 00:04 +0100, you wrote:
>> Hang on a second!
>> Yes, it is true, you can get a true grade 5 from color heads on many papers.
>> But, negative development has nothing to do with that. Paper contrast is
>> measured as a log exposure range of the paper. This is independent of the
>> negative, and consequently, not related to negative development.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> Regards
>>
>>
>>
>> Ralph W. Lambrecht
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> On 1/13/05 11:46 PM, "Rob Champagne" <app@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>
>>> I think we agree on this. My point was merely to dispell the myth that it is
>>> not possible to get a true G5 with dichroic filtration and that with
>>> suitable
>>> neg development it is possible. Having done this if you then use an ilford
>>> MG
>>> filter G5 the resulting print contrast would be G5+
>>>
>>> robc
>>>
>>> At 13/01/2005 14:01 -0800, you wrote:
>>>
>>>> ----- Original Message -----
>>>> From: "Rob Champagne" <app@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>>>> To: <pure-silver@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>>>> Sent: Thursday, January 13, 2005 9:56 AM
>>>> Subject: [pure-silver] Re: New color head "discoveries"
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>> big snip
>>>>>
>>>>>> The filters of a color head will not give you the full
>>>>>> range of contrast available from VC paper with the use of
>>>>>> dedicated filters. They should give you a couple contrast
>>>>>> grades on either side of "normal" but filters should be
>>>>>> used
>>>>>> to obtain the maximum and minimum contrast values.
>>>>>
>>>>> big snip
>>>>>
>>>>>> ---
>>>>>> Richard Knoppow
>>>>>
>>>>> I wonder whether my observation is true for other dichroic
>>>>> filter head enlargers.
>>>>> The Ilford Y+M figures for grade 2 on my Durst CLS501 head
>>>>> enlarger give approx an ISO grade 1 result on paper.
>>>>> It occurs to me that because dichroic filtration does not
>>>>> seem to give as much contrast as filter sets, and because
>>>>> most new enlargers have dichroic heads, that Ilford, and
>>>>> maybe other manufacturers, use this to its advantage in
>>>>> terms of film speed.
>>>>> To get a true ISO grade 2 using ilfords G2 Y+M figures for
>>>>> my enlarger I have to give the negative more development
>>>>> which in turn gives allows a faster film speed.
>>>>> So what I'm speculating here is that modern film speeds
>>>>> may be tailored by the manufacturers to suit printing on
>>>>> dichroic heads with Y+M filtration.
>>>>> It should be noted that by using increased development of
>>>>> the negative the overall contrast obtainable from a
>>>>> dichroic is not far short of a true G5 and if you take neg
>>>>> development far enough then a true G5 is obtainable from a
>>>>> dichroic head.
>>>>>
>>>>> It all depends on what you are tailoring your development
>>>>> to. Do it to 0 filtration and your negs will be too soft
>>>>> for G5 on dichroic settings. Do it to G2 Y+M settings of
>>>>> your dichroic head and you will get faster film speed and
>>>>> availability of higher contrast in your print.
>>>>>
>>>> What are the other conditions of the comparison? Are the
>>>> filters being used in the same enlarger or a different
>>>> enlarger? What I am trying to get at is that if the filters
>>>> are being used in a condenser enlarger the difference in
>>>> contrast will be due to that. Color heads are very diffuse
>>>> sources. The type of light makes little or no difference to
>>>> the dye images of color but will change the silver image
>>>> film about one paper grade.
>>>> If the settings of the color head re right for the paper
>>>> it should exactly duplicate the contrast of a filter for
>>>> that grade. The limitation of the color head is that it may
>>>> not be able to reach the extremes of the contrast range of
>>>> the paper. This is normally of little consequence.
>>>> Since ISO film speed is measured at a fixed contrast
>>>> (about right for diffusion printing) a change in contrast
>>>> will result in a change of effective speed. changing the
>>>> contrast up or down about one paper grade will result in a
>>>> change in film speed of around 3/4 stop up or down. Changing
>>>> either film conrast or paper contrast should have exactly
>>>> the same effect on the print.
>>>>
>>>> ---
>>>> Richard Knoppow
>>>> Los Angeles, CA, USA
>>>> dickburk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>>>
>>>> ===========================================================================
>>>> ==
>>>> ================================
>>>> To unsubscribe from this list, go to www.freelists.org and logon to your
>>>> account (the same e-mail address and password you set-up when you
>>>> subscribed,) and unsubscribe from there.
>>>
>>> ============================================================================
>>> ==
>>> ===============================
>>> To unsubscribe from this list, go to www.freelists.org and logon to your
>>> account (the same e-mail address and password you set-up when you
>>> subscribed,)
>>> and unsubscribe from there.
>>
>>
>>
>> =============================================================================
>> ================================
>> To unsubscribe from this list, go to www.freelists.org and logon to your
>> account (the same e-mail address and password you set-up when you
>> subscribed,) and unsubscribe from there.
>
> ==============================================================================
> ===============================
> To unsubscribe from this list, go to www.freelists.org and logon to your
> account (the same e-mail address and password you set-up when you subscribed,)
> and unsubscribe from there.
=============================================================================================================
To unsubscribe from this list, go to www.freelists.org and logon to your
account (the same e-mail address and password you set-up when you subscribed,)
and unsubscribe from there.
Other related posts:
