[gmpi] Re: Req 76,78
- From: "Angus F. Hewlett" <angus@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: gmpi@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Tue, 08 Feb 2005 10:32:47 +0000
Didier Dambrin wrote:
I agree, it looks like if for some people here the GUI is just about a
couple of knobs controlling parameters,
And indeed, for probably 95% of plug-ins in existence, it is exactly
this, or very little more.
Even if you look at the feature-rich end of conventional plug-ins -
something like ImpOSCar, Albino, Waves plug-ins - you still need only
knobs and parameters.. the patch management features could (and should)
be pushed in to the host.
while it can be much more than that.
Indeed. But maybe it's best for GMPI to cover the 90% really well, make
it easy (and, in effect, compulsory) for newbie plug-in developers to do
things in the right way, whilst at the same time recognising that this
does NOT work well for the other 10%, and that a solution will be needed
for that.
My thinking is that the needs of apps like FL Studio, Kontakt, DR-008
etc. are really better served by an evolution of the JACK paradigm, but
we'll be able to reuse a lot of the same conventions and structures
developed for
GMPI when the time comes to build such a thing. Having memory
protection, your own message loop and everything else that comes with a
full process-context would make development of such things easier, and
user experience better.
(The only reservation I have about this is regarding the IPC performance
of Windows... does anyone have any hard information as to whether or not
this will be better in Longhorn?)
Regards,
Angus.
--
=========================================================
Angus F. Hewlett, Managing Director (CEO)
FXpansion Audio UK Ltd - http://www.fxpansion.com
Registered in the UK - #4455834 - VAT: GB 798 7782 33
=========================================================
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Generalized Music Plugin Interface (GMPI) public discussion list
Participation in this list is contingent upon your abiding by the
following rules: Please stay on topic. You are responsible for your own
words. Please respect your fellow subscribers. Please do not
redistribute anyone else's words without their permission.
Archive: //www.freelists.org/archives/gmpi
Email gmpi-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx w/ subject "unsubscribe" to unsubscribe
Other related posts:
- » [gmpi] Req 76,78
- » [gmpi] Re: Req 76,78
- » [gmpi] Re: Req 76,78
- » [gmpi] Re: Req 76,78
- » [gmpi] Re: Req 76,78
- » [gmpi] Re: Req 76,78
- » [gmpi] Re: Req 76,78
- » [gmpi] Re: Req 76,78
- » [gmpi] Re: Req 76,78
- » [gmpi] Re: Req 76,78
- » [gmpi] Re: Req 76,78
- » [gmpi] Re: Req 76,78
- » [gmpi] Re: Req 76,78
- » [gmpi] Re: Req 76,78
- » [gmpi] Re: Req 76,78
- » [gmpi] Re: Req 76,78
- » [gmpi] Re: Req 76,78
- » [gmpi] Re: Req 76,78
- » [gmpi] Re: Req 76,78
- » [gmpi] Re: Req 76,78
- » [gmpi] Re: Req 76,78
- » [gmpi] Re: Req 76,78
- » [gmpi] Re: Req 76,78
- » [gmpi] Re: Req 76,78
- » [gmpi] Re: Req 76,78
- » [gmpi] Re: Req 76,78
- » [gmpi] Re: Req 76,78
- » [gmpi] Re: Req 76,78
- » [gmpi] Re: Req 76,78
- » [gmpi] Re: Req 76,78
- » [gmpi] Re: Req 76,78
- » [gmpi] Re: Req 76,78
- » [gmpi] Re: Req 76,78
- » [gmpi] Re: Req 76,78
- » [gmpi] Re: Req 76,78
- » [gmpi] Re: Req 76,78
- » [gmpi] Re: Req 76,78
- » [gmpi] Re: Req 76,78
- » [gmpi] Re: Req 76,78
- » [gmpi] Re: Req 76,78