[argyllcms] Re: FWA Compensation

  • From: Graeme Gill <graeme@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • To: argyllcms@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Date: Tue, 21 Feb 2012 12:01:25 +1100

Vladimir Gajic wrote:
> One question at the end about the fwa content calculated by -f: How is the 
> figure to be
> interpreted? Can we talk about percentage (e.g 0.5 = 5% or 0.5%), or is it a 
> dimensionless
> number related to the specific algorythm?

        it's the latter. It's for diagnostics, but gives some idea of
whether FWA is detected, and how much.

> Haven't read your paper on the issue yet ;)

There are two papers - one for the original FWA work I did in 2003, and the one 
did last year on illumread.

Graeme Gill.

Other related posts: