[argyllcms] Re: FWA Compensation

  • From: Graeme Gill <graeme@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • To: argyllcms@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Date: Wed, 15 Feb 2012 23:02:11 +1100

Vladimir Gajic wrote:
> well, in that case I'm also tempted to try both ways and to compare the 
> results. This will
> probably be the best thing to do. If I'm right, there are 3 possible 
> combinations:
> 1. Calculate a default output printer profile using ICC-specified conditions 
> as D50, 2 deg.
> observer
> 2. Calcilate a output printer profile using my new Heaven 42 based illuminant 
> and FWA
> compensation
> 3. Calculating a new, proofing paper based illuminant and applying it along 
> with FWA
> compensation to a new output profile.

Hi,
        I wouldn't bother with 1. If matching is critical, then using the 
measured
illuminant rather than D50 is a minimum requirement.

Graeme Gill.

Other related posts: