[argyllcms] Re: FWA Compensation
- From: Vladimir Gajic <vgajic67@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: "argyllcms@xxxxxxxxxxxxx" <argyllcms@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 15 Feb 2012 13:45:43 +0100
Perfect. That reduces the process to step 2 and 3.
I'll report.
Regards
Vladimir
Am 15.02.2012 um 13:02 schrieb Graeme Gill <graeme@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>:
> Vladimir Gajic wrote:
>> well, in that case I'm also tempted to try both ways and to compare the
>> results. This will
>> probably be the best thing to do. If I'm right, there are 3 possible
>> combinations:
>> 1. Calculate a default output printer profile using ICC-specified conditions
>> as D50, 2 deg.
>> observer
>> 2. Calcilate a output printer profile using my new Heaven 42 based
>> illuminant and FWA
>> compensation
>> 3. Calculating a new, proofing paper based illuminant and applying it along
>> with FWA
>> compensation to a new output profile.
>
> Hi,
> I wouldn't bother with 1. If matching is critical, then using the measured
> illuminant rather than D50 is a minimum requirement.
>
> Graeme Gill.
>
Other related posts:
