[pure-silver] Re: NOW: Exposing paper was Re: POP with paper negs?
- From: "richard l. gifford" <rlgif@xxxxxxx>
- To: pure-silver@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Sat, 18 Dec 2004 12:05:40 -0600
DarkroomMagic wrote:
> ... be aware that Mortensen and
> AA couldn't even agree on the time of day....
An understatement for sure. The war is more obvious in
Ansel's writings. Mortensen is fun to read for some of
his subtle references.
> For this discussion, I like to clarify that when talking about highlights, I
> don't refer to the brightest specular highlights in the print. I'm talking
> about the lightest image dominating areas....
>
And when I'm talking about dodging on the first work
print, I'm talking about the deepest shadows which I
know in advance are not going to show anything
otherwise. I think we're not that far apart, at least
I hope not, because I continually gather lots of solid
insight from your long experience.
Regards... Dick Gifford
=============================================================================================================
To unsubscribe from this list, go to www.freelists.org and logon to your
account (the same e-mail address and password you set-up when you subscribed,)
and unsubscribe from there.
Other related posts:
