[pure-silver] Re: NOW: Exposing paper was Re: POP with paper negs?
- From: Richard Urmonas <rurmonas@xxxxxxxxxx>
- To: pure-silver@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Thu, 16 Dec 2004 13:30:08 +101800
Quoting Ryuji Suzuki <rs@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>:
> Also, you said "eyes are attracted by light" --- Is that an assertion
> or a fact?
I also question this. My experience has been that with a portrait, peoples
vision locks onto the face.
The background can be pure white, and they will not even notice the background.
Richard
--
Richard Urmonas
=============================================================================================================
To unsubscribe from this list, go to www.freelists.org and logon to your
account (the same e-mail address and password you set-up when you subscribed,)
and unsubscribe from there.
- Follow-Ups:
- [pure-silver] Selenium followed by T-8 Polysulfide
- From: Peter De Smidt
- [pure-silver] Re: NOW: Exposing paper was Re: POP with paper negs?
- From: Ryuji Suzuki
- [pure-silver] Re: NOW: Exposing paper was Re: POP with paper negs?
- From: DarkroomMagic
- References:
- [pure-silver] Re: NOW: Exposing paper was Re: POP with paper negs?
- From: Ryuji Suzuki
- [pure-silver] Re: NOW: Exposing paper was Re: POP with paper negs?
- From: DarkroomMagic
- [pure-silver] Re: NOW: Exposing paper was Re: POP with paper negs?
- From: Ryuji Suzuki
Other related posts:
- » [pure-silver] NOW: Exposing paper was Re: POP with paper negs?
- » [pure-silver] Re: NOW: Exposing paper was Re: POP with paper negs?
- » [pure-silver] Re: NOW: Exposing paper was Re: POP with paper negs?
- » [pure-silver] Re: NOW: Exposing paper was Re: POP with paper negs?
- » [pure-silver] Re: NOW: Exposing paper was Re: POP with paper negs?
- » [pure-silver] Re: NOW: Exposing paper was Re: POP with paper negs?
- » [pure-silver] Re: NOW: Exposing paper was Re: POP with paper negs?
- » [pure-silver] Re: NOW: Exposing paper was Re: POP with paper negs?
- » [pure-silver] Re: NOW: Exposing paper was Re: POP with paper negs?
- » [pure-silver] Re: NOW: Exposing paper was Re: POP with paper negs?
- » [pure-silver] Re: NOW: Exposing paper was Re: POP with paper negs?
- » [pure-silver] Re: NOW: Exposing paper was Re: POP with paper negs?
- » [pure-silver] Re: NOW: Exposing paper was Re: POP with paper negs?
- » [pure-silver] Re: NOW: Exposing paper was Re: POP with paper negs?
- » [pure-silver] Re: NOW: Exposing paper was Re: POP with paper negs?
- » [pure-silver] Re: NOW: Exposing paper was Re: POP with paper negs?
- » [pure-silver] Re: NOW: Exposing paper was Re: POP with paper negs?
- » [pure-silver] Re: NOW: Exposing paper was Re: POP with paper negs?
- » [pure-silver] Re: NOW: Exposing paper was Re: POP with paper negs?
- » [pure-silver] Re: NOW: Exposing paper was Re: POP with paper negs?
- » [pure-silver] Re: NOW: Exposing paper was Re: POP with paper negs?
- » [pure-silver] Re: NOW: Exposing paper was Re: POP with paper negs?
- » [pure-silver] Re: NOW: Exposing paper was Re: POP with paper negs?
- » [pure-silver] Re: NOW: Exposing paper was Re: POP with paper negs?
- » [pure-silver] Re: NOW: Exposing paper was Re: POP with paper negs?
- » [pure-silver] Re: NOW: Exposing paper was Re: POP with paper negs?
- » [pure-silver] Re: NOW: Exposing paper was Re: POP with paper negs?
- » [pure-silver] Re: NOW: Exposing paper was Re: POP with paper negs?
- » [pure-silver] Re: NOW: Exposing paper was Re: POP with paper negs?
- » [pure-silver] Re: NOW: Exposing paper was Re: POP with paper negs?
- [pure-silver] Selenium followed by T-8 Polysulfide
- From: Peter De Smidt
- [pure-silver] Re: NOW: Exposing paper was Re: POP with paper negs?
- From: Ryuji Suzuki
- [pure-silver] Re: NOW: Exposing paper was Re: POP with paper negs?
- From: DarkroomMagic
- [pure-silver] Re: NOW: Exposing paper was Re: POP with paper negs?
- From: Ryuji Suzuki
- [pure-silver] Re: NOW: Exposing paper was Re: POP with paper negs?
- From: DarkroomMagic
- [pure-silver] Re: NOW: Exposing paper was Re: POP with paper negs?
- From: Ryuji Suzuki