[pure-silver] Re: NOW: Exposing paper was Re: POP with paper negs?
- From: DarkroomMagic <info@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: PureSilverNew <pure-silver@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 17 Dec 2004 13:51:23 +0100
Perception is truth.
Your writing style is rather aggressive, and it is not beyond comprehension
that this will be interpreted as a verbal attack.
I sometimes feel attacked by you, but it doesn't bother me. I just filter
out what I find useful and leave the rest.
Regards
Ralph W. Lambrecht
On 12/17/04 7:10 AM, "Ryuji Suzuki" <rs@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> -Peter De Smidt
>> How about: "Don't attack people just because they disagree with you."
>
> I'm not attacking anyone.
=============================================================================================================
To unsubscribe from this list, go to www.freelists.org and logon to your
account (the same e-mail address and password you set-up when you subscribed,)
and unsubscribe from there.
- References:
- [pure-silver] Re: NOW: Exposing paper was Re: POP with paper negs?
- From: Ryuji Suzuki
Other related posts:
- » [pure-silver] NOW: Exposing paper was Re: POP with paper negs?
- » [pure-silver] Re: NOW: Exposing paper was Re: POP with paper negs?
- » [pure-silver] Re: NOW: Exposing paper was Re: POP with paper negs?
- » [pure-silver] Re: NOW: Exposing paper was Re: POP with paper negs?
- » [pure-silver] Re: NOW: Exposing paper was Re: POP with paper negs?
- » [pure-silver] Re: NOW: Exposing paper was Re: POP with paper negs?
- » [pure-silver] Re: NOW: Exposing paper was Re: POP with paper negs?
- » [pure-silver] Re: NOW: Exposing paper was Re: POP with paper negs?
- » [pure-silver] Re: NOW: Exposing paper was Re: POP with paper negs?
- » [pure-silver] Re: NOW: Exposing paper was Re: POP with paper negs?
- » [pure-silver] Re: NOW: Exposing paper was Re: POP with paper negs?
- » [pure-silver] Re: NOW: Exposing paper was Re: POP with paper negs?
- » [pure-silver] Re: NOW: Exposing paper was Re: POP with paper negs?
- » [pure-silver] Re: NOW: Exposing paper was Re: POP with paper negs?
- » [pure-silver] Re: NOW: Exposing paper was Re: POP with paper negs?
- » [pure-silver] Re: NOW: Exposing paper was Re: POP with paper negs?
- » [pure-silver] Re: NOW: Exposing paper was Re: POP with paper negs?
- » [pure-silver] Re: NOW: Exposing paper was Re: POP with paper negs?
- » [pure-silver] Re: NOW: Exposing paper was Re: POP with paper negs?
- » [pure-silver] Re: NOW: Exposing paper was Re: POP with paper negs?
- » [pure-silver] Re: NOW: Exposing paper was Re: POP with paper negs?
- » [pure-silver] Re: NOW: Exposing paper was Re: POP with paper negs?
- » [pure-silver] Re: NOW: Exposing paper was Re: POP with paper negs?
- » [pure-silver] Re: NOW: Exposing paper was Re: POP with paper negs?
- » [pure-silver] Re: NOW: Exposing paper was Re: POP with paper negs?
- » [pure-silver] Re: NOW: Exposing paper was Re: POP with paper negs?
- » [pure-silver] Re: NOW: Exposing paper was Re: POP with paper negs?
- » [pure-silver] Re: NOW: Exposing paper was Re: POP with paper negs?
- » [pure-silver] Re: NOW: Exposing paper was Re: POP with paper negs?
- » [pure-silver] Re: NOW: Exposing paper was Re: POP with paper negs?
- [pure-silver] Re: NOW: Exposing paper was Re: POP with paper negs?
- From: Ryuji Suzuki