[pure-silver] Re: NOW: Exposing paper was Re: POP with paper negs?
- From: DarkroomMagic <info@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: PureSilverNew <pure-silver@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 18 Dec 2004 21:33:44 +0100
As long as we both enjoy photography, we can't be far apart.
All the best.
Regards
Ralph W. Lambrecht
On 12/18/04 7:05 PM, "richard l. gifford" <rlgif@xxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> DarkroomMagic wrote:
>
>> ... be aware that Mortensen and
>> AA couldn't even agree on the time of day....
>
> An understatement for sure. The war is more obvious in
> Ansel's writings. Mortensen is fun to read for some of
> his subtle references.
>
>> For this discussion, I like to clarify that when talking about highlights, I
>> don't refer to the brightest specular highlights in the print. I'm talking
>> about the lightest image dominating areas....
>>
>
> And when I'm talking about dodging on the first work
> print, I'm talking about the deepest shadows which I
> know in advance are not going to show anything
> otherwise. I think we're not that far apart, at least
> I hope not, because I continually gather lots of solid
> insight from your long experience.
>
> Regards... Dick Gifford
>
>
>
> ==============================================================================
> ===============================
> To unsubscribe from this list, go to www.freelists.org and logon to your
> account (the same e-mail address and password you set-up when you subscribed,)
> and unsubscribe from there.
=============================================================================================================
To unsubscribe from this list, go to www.freelists.org and logon to your
account (the same e-mail address and password you set-up when you subscribed,)
and unsubscribe from there.
Other related posts:
