----- Original Message ----- From: "Ryuji Suzuki" <rs@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> To: <pure-silver@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>; <titrisol@xxxxxxxxx> Sent: Thursday, January 06, 2005 12:37 PM Subject: [pure-silver] Re: Ralph Lambrecht / EM10 enlarging meter? > From: titrisol <titrisol@xxxxxxxxx> > Subject: [pure-silver] Re: Ralph Lambrecht / EM10 > enlarging meter? > Date: Thu, 6 Jan 2005 11:56:36 -0800 (PST) > >> - Use a grayscale in the negative holder (6x6) then >> measure the Em10 >> setting for 2 or 3 stops. Then print a test with the >> Kodak Wedge >> and determine exposure for zone 1, 5 and 8 After that >> since I had >> made a table of +- stops I can determine the times >> required to >> generate any gray tone for the paper. > > I've tried to calibrate EM-10 but it's not that useful... > > EM-10 uses CdS as the photosensor, and this cell is > sensitive to wide > range of spectrum including safelight. Unless you put a > blue-green > filter on the hole, you'll have to shut the safelight when > using > EM-10. But then how are you going to deal with contrast > filters? > (Fine, my most precious paper is graded.) > > With that limitation in mind, calibration can be easily > done with an > ordinary incident light meter. With Sekonic L-408 meter > set at 100 > speed, 2.5 * 2^EV is pretty close to lux. (Note: different > light > meters are calibrated differently. I've compared my meter > with my > friend's Minolta meter, but it was significantly > different. Light > meters are not designed for this purpose anyway, I'm > merely suggesting > they can be used this way if you know the meter's > calibration.) You > can set an empty neg carrier and change the aperture > and/or head > height to create a range of illuminances at which you make > a > calibration table for EM-10. Then fit a suitable curve and > interpolate. > > But when I'm *mass* printing something, I usually fix > exposure time > and change aperture to adjust the illuminance. (Don't use > clicks on > the lens) If the negative is exposed rather uniformly, > this generally > works very well and EM-10 doesn't need to be calibrated. > > -- > Ryuji Suzuki > "Keep a good head and always carry a light camera." The safelight near my enlarger is connected to the timer so that is is off when the enlarger is on. I've not had a problem from this. The EM-10 seems to give the right exposure for various VC filters, I have not had a problem in practice with this. It is more sensitive than my Luna-Pro, certainly much faster in very dim light. One can also calibrate using a pin hole source and inverse square law. The pin hole is small enough to act as virtual point source. By pin hole I mean a small hole but one large enough to let enough light through. If the minimum distance is a couple of feet a hole the size made by a paper punch is small enough. I have simply marked the dial on my EM-10 with a fine point "Sharpie" marker at one stop intervals. I don't often use the EM-10 to measure contrast because I have an ancient densitometer which is adequate for B&W but it is capable of the measurement. I generally make proofs either at No.2 or by visual guess and then adjust both contrast and exposure according to what I see. The EM-10 is very useful for getting ball-park exposure when changing magnification, and, with a little experience, when changing papers. Speaking of old favorite papers, I recently tested some very old Agfa Brovira. This is probably paper given to me by a friend who closed his darkroom and must be more than twenty years old. It seems to print without fog and at normal speed. I have rather a lot of old graded paper and will be testing it in the near future. My past experience is that Agfa paper is very long lived. --- Richard Knoppow Los Angeles, CA, USA dickburk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx ============================================================================================================= To unsubscribe from this list, go to www.freelists.org and logon to your account (the same e-mail address and password you set-up when you subscribed,) and unsubscribe from there.