I fully agree. In addition, I find test strips extremely useful and wouldn't want to eliminate them completely. I have used the EM-10 but have switched now to the RHDesigns ZoneMaster, which is head and shoulders above any other meter I've seen. However, I use it to give me starting points for exposure and paper contrast. Then I do test strips in small increments (1/12 stop for exposure and 1/4 grades for contrast) to get to the 'best' work print. This allows me to make predictions for the final grade (which I do down to 1/8 grade) and get started with local exposure and contrast optimizations. I would feel handicapped without the meter, but also without test strips. I want to see the whole spectrum from too light to too dark, and from too soft to too hard, to make the final print. Regards Ralph W. Lambrecht On 1/7/05 7:31 PM, "Richard Knoppow" <dickburk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > In any case, I find the EM-10 very useful. It does not > eliminate tests and having to make visual judgements but > does reduce the amount of exposure testing considerably. ============================================================================================================= To unsubscribe from this list, go to www.freelists.org and logon to your account (the same e-mail address and password you set-up when you subscribed,) and unsubscribe from there.