Omar Kusturica wrote: "... moral right to rule over lands like ..." There is no moral right to rule. There is only the ability to enforce authority to rule. For some states this authority arises from an enlightened agreement amongst the citizenry. For other states, it arises from the threat to commit violence against those who disagree. If there is a moral distinction to be made with regards to the rule of states in the Middle East, the distinction between enlightened agreement and threats of violence is a good place to start. To insert a practical dimension, if one were to find oneself in trouble with the law, in which Middle Eastern country would one prefer to be located? Sincerely, Phil Enns Toronto, ON ------------------------------------------------------------------ To change your Lit-Ideas settings (subscribe/unsub, vacation on/off, digest on/off), visit www.andreas.com/faq-lit-ideas.html