[openbeos] Re: on SoftwareValet for OBOS
- From: "Travis Geiselbrecht" <geist@xxxxxxxxxx>
- To: <openbeos@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 19 Jan 2002 20:43:22 -0800
Because a lot of people don?t know what they're talking about.
Travis
> -----Original Message-----
> From: openbeos-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> [mailto:openbeos-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Steve Vallée
> Sent: Saturday, January 19, 2002 8:21 PM
> To: openbeos@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: [openbeos] Re: on SoftwareValet for OBOS
>
>
> But a question remain. Why so many people flamed Be Inc to
> include the network stuff (BONE) inside the kernel itself, if
> that kernel was monolithic anyway ? I'm a bit confuse here.
> Someone can put a light on this for me ?
>
> thanks
> Steve
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Manuel Jesus Petit de Gabriel" <freston@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> To: <openbeos@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Sent: Saturday, January 19, 2002 7:36 PM
> Subject: [openbeos] Re: on SoftwareValet for OBOS
>
>
> >
> >
> > > I'm fully on your side. The most important part in the name
> > > "OpenBeOS"
> > must
> > > be ... "BeOS". And I'm not a big fan of Linux too (I hate
> > > monolithics kernels).
> >
> > This paragraph is not coherent: first praise BeOS for later stating
> > that
> you
> > hate monolithic kernels. BeOS kernel is a monolithic
> (thought modular)
> one.
> >
> >
> > manuel,
> >
> >
> >
>
>
>
Other related posts: