[openbeos] Re: on SoftwareValet for OBOS

  • From: "Manuel Jesus Petit de Gabriel" <freston@xxxxxxxxxxx>
  • To: <openbeos@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Sat, 19 Jan 2002 20:47:47 -0800


> But a question remain. Why so many people flamed Be Inc to include the
> network stuff (BONE) inside the kernel itself, if that kernel was
monolithic
> anyway ?  I'm a bit confuse here. Someone can put a light on this for me ?

I think it has to do with the massive instabilities in the early versions of
Bone,
net_server crashed as much than those early versions... but at least the
system
remained alive with net_server.


manuel,

>
> thanks
> Steve
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Manuel Jesus Petit de Gabriel" <freston@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> To: <openbeos@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Sent: Saturday, January 19, 2002 7:36 PM
> Subject: [openbeos] Re: on SoftwareValet for OBOS
>
>
> >
> >
> > > I'm fully on your side. The most important part in the name "OpenBeOS"
> > must
> > > be ... "BeOS".  And I'm not a big fan of Linux too (I hate monolithics
> > > kernels).
> >
> > This paragraph is not coherent: first praise BeOS for later stating that
> you
> > hate monolithic kernels. BeOS kernel is a monolithic (thought modular)
> one.
> >
> >
> > manuel,
> >
> >
> >
>


Other related posts: