[openbeos] Re: on SoftwareValet for OBOS

  • From: Steve Vallée <svallee@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • To: <openbeos@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Sat, 19 Jan 2002 20:20:35 -0800

But a question remain. Why so many people flamed Be Inc to include the
network stuff (BONE) inside the kernel itself, if that kernel was monolithic
anyway ?  I'm a bit confuse here. Someone can put a light on this for me ?


----- Original Message -----
From: "Manuel Jesus Petit de Gabriel" <freston@xxxxxxxxxxx>
To: <openbeos@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Saturday, January 19, 2002 7:36 PM
Subject: [openbeos] Re: on SoftwareValet for OBOS

> > I'm fully on your side. The most important part in the name "OpenBeOS"
> must
> > be ... "BeOS".  And I'm not a big fan of Linux too (I hate monolithics
> > kernels).
> This paragraph is not coherent: first praise BeOS for later stating that
> hate monolithic kernels. BeOS kernel is a monolithic (thought modular)
> manuel,

Other related posts: