Hello everyone,I'll take this time to check who still wants to be involved in the project, since I wouldn't want to keep flooding the inboxes of those who aren't still interested. Let me know what times work for everyone this weekend and we'll see if we can find 30 minutes to allocate for a Skype meeting. For those that don't reply I'll assume you're no longer interested in the project (aside from Jaime who told me he's still interested and will not be available this Summer.
Thank you to everyone for the help, I hope we can setup a meeting to talk this weekend sometime.
Thanks, Nate On 6/26/2014 5:43 PM, Mikhail Gofman wrote:
We can meet. Please let me know the time that will work for everyone. Thanks, -MikhailOn Thu, Jun 26, 2014 at 5:41 PM, Nathan Cobb <nathancobb@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx <mailto:nathancobb@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>> wrote:Mikhail, Yes, that is correct. We play to be ready for deployment by the middle (if not early) of next week. I guess my interpretation of our intentions was incorrect then. Perhaps we should hold a meeting among the team with you included so we can make sure we're on the same page prior to our meeting with Susan. Thanks, Nate On 6/26/2014 4:53 PM, Mikhail Gofman wrote:Dear Susan, Our ultimate goal is to host the application on the world wide web. We are not there yet. Before deploying the application on the world wide web, we must first test it in both the lab and in the "wild". This step is crucial. It will help us to make sure that the application performs in accordance to the requirements and is both stable and secure. To help us test the system in the "wild", we would like to first deploy it on a single desktop system in your office. The system should have around 6GB of memory and a fairly modern processor (at least dual-core). The system should also be connected to the Internet. This will enable us to distribute bug fixes and updates/upgrades to the system. As per my last communication with the team, I believe that we are almost ready for deployment. Nate, is my interpretation of the latest burst of emails correct? I believe that we should set up a meeting with Boris. His technical expertise will make the whole process easier. Thanks, -Mikhail On Thu, Jun 26, 2014 at 2:46 PM, Nathan Cobb <nathancobb@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx <mailto:nathancobb@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>> wrote: Susan, If I understand you correctly you're talking about web hosting. Based on the sensitivity of the information, and for security purposes, the plan was not to have the website hosted on the internet, but rather via your internal network. However, although the website itself will to be hosted via your internal network, we still want to have the system connected to the internet (if possible) so that we can easily update the system when we need to. Hopefully that makes sense to you, but if not I'd gladly be willing to give you a call to explain it a bit better. Maybe Mikhail can do a better job? Thanks, Nate ---------- On June 26, 2014 11:20:52 AM Susan Sober <spsblau@xxxxxxxxxxxxx <mailto:spsblau@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>> wrote: > Hi does the software have its own site for secure hosting > > Sent from my iPhone > > > On Jun 26, 2014, at 4:23 AM, Nathan Cobb <nathancobb@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx <mailto:nathancobb@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>> wrote: > > Susan, > > Jeremy just informed me that he just finished making the final changes to the website as far as implementing all of the features that we (and you) agreed upon/wanted in the website. All that's left to do is testing the systems and fixing bugs that we may have missed. > > As I previously stated, our intention is to have the systems ready for Boris to download and install on your systems. I'll keep you updated as things change as well as contact you about setting up a meeting when the time comes. > > Thank you for your patience and help! > > Regards, > > Nate