[FSW Project] Re: FSW Project Update

  • From: Mikhail Gofman <migsoft2@xxxxxxxxx>
  • To: "fswproject@xxxxxxxxxxxxx" <fswproject@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Thu, 26 Jun 2014 17:43:28 -0700

We can meet.

Please let me know the time that will work for everyone.


On Thu, Jun 26, 2014 at 5:41 PM, Nathan Cobb <nathancobb@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

>  Mikhail,
> Yes, that is correct. We play to be ready for deployment by the middle (if
> not early) of next week.
> I guess my interpretation of our intentions was incorrect then. Perhaps we
> should hold a meeting among the team with you included so we can make sure
> we're on the same page prior to our meeting with Susan.
> Thanks,
> Nate
> On 6/26/2014 4:53 PM, Mikhail Gofman wrote:
>   Dear Susan,
>  Our ultimate goal is to host the application on the world wide web. We
> are not there yet.
> Before deploying the application on the world wide web, we must first test
> it in both the lab and in the "wild".
>  This step is crucial. It will help us to make sure that the application
> performs in accordance to the requirements and is both stable and secure.
>  To help us test the system in the "wild", we would like to first deploy
> it on a single desktop system in your office.
>  The system should have around 6GB of memory and a fairly modern
> processor (at least dual-core).
>  The system should also be connected to the Internet. This will enable us
> to distribute bug fixes and updates/upgrades to the system.
>  As per my last communication with the team, I believe that we are almost
> ready for deployment.
>  Nate, is my interpretation of the latest burst of emails correct?
>  I believe that we should set up a meeting with Boris. His technical
> expertise will make the whole process easier.
>  Thanks,
> -Mikhail
> On Thu, Jun 26, 2014 at 2:46 PM, Nathan Cobb <nathancobb@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > wrote:
>>  Susan,
>> If I understand you correctly you're talking about web hosting. Based on
>> the sensitivity of the information, and for security purposes, the plan was
>> not to have the website hosted on the internet, but rather via your
>> internal network. However, although the website itself will to be hosted
>> via your internal network, we still want to have the system connected to
>> the internet (if possible) so that we can easily update the system when we
>> need to.
>> Hopefully that makes sense to you, but if not I'd gladly be willing to
>> give you a call to explain it a bit better. Maybe Mikhail can do a better
>> job?
>> Thanks,
>> Nate
>> ----------
>> On June 26, 2014 11:20:52 AM Susan Sober <spsblau@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> > Hi does the software have its own site for secure hosting
>> >
>> > Sent from my iPhone
>> >
>> > > On Jun 26, 2014, at 4:23 AM, Nathan Cobb <
>> nathancobb@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> > > Susan,
>> > > Jeremy just informed me that he just finished making the final
>> changes to the website as far as implementing all of the features that we
>> (and you) agreed upon/wanted in the website. All that's left to do is
>> testing the systems and fixing bugs that we may have missed.
>> > > As I previously stated, our intention is to have the systems ready
>> for Boris to download and install on your systems. I'll keep you updated as
>> things change as well as contact you about setting up a meeting when the
>> time comes.
>> > > Thank you for your patience and help!
>> > > Regards,
>> > > Nate

Other related posts: