We can meet. Please let me know the time that will work for everyone. Thanks, -Mikhail On Thu, Jun 26, 2014 at 5:41 PM, Nathan Cobb <nathancobb@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Mikhail, > > Yes, that is correct. We play to be ready for deployment by the middle (if > not early) of next week. > > I guess my interpretation of our intentions was incorrect then. Perhaps we > should hold a meeting among the team with you included so we can make sure > we're on the same page prior to our meeting with Susan. > > Thanks, > Nate > > > On 6/26/2014 4:53 PM, Mikhail Gofman wrote: > > Dear Susan, > > Our ultimate goal is to host the application on the world wide web. We > are not there yet. > Before deploying the application on the world wide web, we must first test > it in both the lab and in the "wild". > This step is crucial. It will help us to make sure that the application > performs in accordance to the requirements and is both stable and secure. > > To help us test the system in the "wild", we would like to first deploy > it on a single desktop system in your office. > The system should have around 6GB of memory and a fairly modern > processor (at least dual-core). > The system should also be connected to the Internet. This will enable us > to distribute bug fixes and updates/upgrades to the system. > > As per my last communication with the team, I believe that we are almost > ready for deployment. > Nate, is my interpretation of the latest burst of emails correct? > > I believe that we should set up a meeting with Boris. His technical > expertise will make the whole process easier. > > Thanks, > -Mikhail > > > On Thu, Jun 26, 2014 at 2:46 PM, Nathan Cobb <nathancobb@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > > wrote: > >> Susan, >> >> If I understand you correctly you're talking about web hosting. Based on >> the sensitivity of the information, and for security purposes, the plan was >> not to have the website hosted on the internet, but rather via your >> internal network. However, although the website itself will to be hosted >> via your internal network, we still want to have the system connected to >> the internet (if possible) so that we can easily update the system when we >> need to. >> >> Hopefully that makes sense to you, but if not I'd gladly be willing to >> give you a call to explain it a bit better. Maybe Mikhail can do a better >> job? >> >> Thanks, >> Nate >> >> ---------- >> On June 26, 2014 11:20:52 AM Susan Sober <spsblau@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> >> > Hi does the software have its own site for secure hosting >> > >> > Sent from my iPhone >> >> > >> > > On Jun 26, 2014, at 4:23 AM, Nathan Cobb < >> nathancobb@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> > > Susan, >> > > Jeremy just informed me that he just finished making the final >> changes to the website as far as implementing all of the features that we >> (and you) agreed upon/wanted in the website. All that's left to do is >> testing the systems and fixing bugs that we may have missed. >> > > As I previously stated, our intention is to have the systems ready >> for Boris to download and install on your systems. I'll keep you updated as >> things change as well as contact you about setting up a meeting when the >> time comes. >> > > Thank you for your patience and help! >> > > Regards, >> > > Nate >> > > >