[projectaon] Re: 01hh Comment Period
- From: "James Murray" <barefootjimmy@xxxxxxxxx>
- To: projectaon@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Fri, 20 Jun 2008 09:42:51 -0500
I seem to be in an overwhelming minority, and the points everyone
brings are valid, but I feel like the issue I raised is still going
unanswered. I'm in 100% agreement that there's no point in continuing
to fire once you hear the scream, but I'd still say there exists a
flaw in that you can magically know beforehand that it's
impossible/not worth trying to shoot at the guy even before you pull
the trigger for the first time. I'm not saying there's a perfect
solution, but i does seem to be a slight flaw in game design (one
whose fix may well be beyond the mission of PA, since as Iain pointed
out, the order of words lends weight to his interpretation).
I would agree that needing to fire at least once is a no-brainer.
--Jimmy
> I'm inclined to agree. The point seems to be: the more ammo you fire, the
> more
> likely you are to hit; and there's no point in continuing to fire once
> you've
> hit the target, as evidenced by its scream. So it's not a premeditated
> number of
> rounds you fire, it's a case of "keep firing 'til it's dead, or you run out,
> or
> you decide to stop".
>
> --
> Simon Osborne
> Project Aon
>
> ~~~~~~
> Manage your subscription at //www.freelists.org/list/projectaon
>
>
> __________________________________________________________
> Sent from Yahoo! Mail.
> A Smarter Email http://uk.docs.yahoo.com/nowyoucan.html
~~~~~~
Manage your subscription at //www.freelists.org/list/projectaon
Other related posts:
