[projectaon] Re: 01hh Comment Period
- From: James Durrant <james.durrant@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: <projectaon@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 20 Jun 2008 14:55:01 +0100
Surely it is possible to get 14 or more without firing a single bullet - does
this make sense?
I'd say we must have a note to say you must fire at least one bullet.
> Date: Fri, 20 Jun 2008 14:42:48 +0100> From: outspaced@xxxxxxxxxxxx> To:
> projectaon@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> Subject: [projectaon] Re: 01hh Comment Period> >
> Iain Smith wrote:> > I've always been a stickler for following the rules and
> instructions as > > they were written. In this case I would think that had JD
> wanted the > > number of bullets to be selected beforehand then it would have
> been > > phrased "add together your shooting and perception skills; for every
> > > bullet you decide to fire, add an additional point to this score. > >
> Finally, select a random number and add it to this total".> > I'm inclined to
> agree. The point seems to be: the more ammo you fire, the more > likely you
> are to hit; and there's no point in continuing to fire once you've > hit the
> target, as evidenced by its scream. So it's not a premeditated number of >
> rounds you fire, it's a case of "keep firing 'til it's dead, or you run out,
> or > you decide to stop".> > -- > Simon Osborne> Project Aon> > ~~~~~~>
> Manage your subscription at //www.freelists.org/list/projectaon> >
Other related posts:
