John Shutt wrote: > If the FCC adopts ATSC A/53C in it's entirety as law, as > they have with A/53B, then yes, it can be enforced. Or > at least amendment 1 paragraph 5.6.1 can be enforced: > > "Limits have been defined for the maximum bitrate in the > Enhanced (E-VSB) service. > > "At all times, the quality of video in the main stream > shall be equal to or better than the equivalent program > in the Enhanced stream. In the event that the > programming is different in the main and Enhanced streams, > a higher resolution format is deemed to be higher quality. > > "Additionally, during premium programming times, the > maximum bitrate in the enhanced (EVSB) stream shall be 3 > Mbps out of the total 19.4 Mbps channel capacity." That text, IIRC all of it, was also there in the previous candidate standard. It's logical, I think. EVSB is meant to be a hierarchical modulation sort of service rather than a complete replacement of the 19.3 Mb/s channel. And even then, the ATSC seems to think it's okay to cut the capacity down to 8.5 or 4.3 Mb/s total, off prime time. The nice thing about E8-VSB is the way it permits very narrow robust channels to be created, taking away as little as possible from the wide stream capacity. It gives a lot of granularity in that way. On the other hand, it does not allow for fine tuning of the robustness of the whole 6 MHz band. That could have been done by directly changing the FEC used in the band, but such a scheme would not have been backward compatible. EVSB had to be layered over the 8-VSB, 2/3 trellis, and RS[208,188] FEC that was already there. Anyway, it's still IMO well suited to the task you suggested. But here too, some field trials would be nice. Bert ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can UNSUBSCRIBE from the OpenDTV list in two ways: - Using the UNSUBSCRIBE command in your user configuration settings at FreeLists.org - By sending a message to: opendtv-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with the word unsubscribe in the subject line.