[haiku-development] Re: Stack and Tile
- From: Niels Reedijk <niels.reedijk@xxxxxxxxx>
- To: haiku-development@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Thu, 15 Apr 2010 18:08:06 +0200
Hey,
On 15 April 2010 18:05, Jorge G. Mare <koki@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Niels Reedijk wrote:
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> On 15 April 2010 16:56, Jorge G. Mare <koki@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> Anyway, it would be nice for the project to take a clear stance on
>>> whether
>>> it wants to embrace S&T or not. The folks from University of //Auckland
>>> deserve to know IMO (even if it means not embracing their code for
>>> whatever
>>> reason).
>>>
>>
>> Indeed this issue was settled then, however, since October 2009
>> nothing has happened at all, they did not assert their SVN access and
>> as such this patch is currently dead.
>>
>> It's not as if SVN access is going to revive the activity. So I'm with
>> Axel here: first let the those that were so inclined to work on it
>> show that they are still alive and kicking (in the form of a patch or
>> patches) and then we can revive the branch with access.
>>
>
> I am not sure what "issue" you are referring to and how or where it was
> settled, but the vote was never wrapped up, and if there was any indication
> of where the tally was going, it was in favor of granting access to the S&T
> devs and not the other way around as you suggest or would like. Instead of
> starting a controversy like you did at the end of the thread (which is what
> probably what killed the vote), cast your +1 or -1 vote and live with it.
Must-ignore-provocation.
> Otherwise, if you are going to start a vote and then totally ignore it, why
> start it in the first place?
Must-ignore-silly-rhetoric.
N>
Other related posts:
