[haiku-development] Re: Stack and Tile

  • From: Niels Reedijk <niels.reedijk@xxxxxxxxx>
  • To: haiku-development@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Date: Thu, 15 Apr 2010 18:08:33 +0200

On 15 April 2010 18:08, Niels Reedijk <niels.reedijk@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Hey,
> On 15 April 2010 18:05, Jorge G. Mare <koki@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> Niels Reedijk wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>> On 15 April 2010 16:56, Jorge G. Mare <koki@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>> Anyway, it would be nice for the project to take a clear stance on
>>>> whether
>>>> it wants to embrace S&T or not. The folks from University of //Auckland
>>>> deserve to know IMO (even if it means not embracing their code for
>>>> whatever
>>>> reason).
>>> Indeed this issue was settled then, however, since October 2009
>>> nothing has happened at all, they did not assert their SVN access and
>>> as such this patch is currently dead.
>>> It's not as if SVN access is going to revive the activity. So I'm with
>>> Axel here: first let the those that were so inclined to work on it
>>> show that they are still alive and kicking (in the form of a patch or
>>> patches) and then we can revive the branch with access.
>> I am not sure what "issue" you are referring to and how or where it was
>> settled, but the vote was never wrapped up, and if there was any indication
>> of where the tally was going, it was in favor of granting access to the S&T
>> devs and not the other way around as you suggest or would like. Instead of
>> starting a controversy like you did at the end of the thread (which is what
>> probably what killed the vote), cast your +1 or -1 vote and live with it.
> Must-ignore-provocation.
>> Otherwise, if you are going to start a vote and then totally ignore it, why
>> start it in the first place?
> Must-ignore-silly-rhetoric.

Oh geesh, of course I meant to do that in solitude...

Other related posts: