On Sun, Feb 16, 2003 at 08:41:51 +0100, Mikael Hillborg wrote: > > 1: Easy to implement > > 2: Support all kinds of applications > > 3: "just work" > > > > I don't find this to be realistic. In my time as a software engineer and > > production manager, > > 1 thing I've learned is that over-confidence is the sure road to failure, > > and that > > "self-limitation" is the road to success (well, that's 2 things > > actually...). > > Anyway, what I'm trying to say is that the 3 points above are more or less > > mutually exclusive, > > or rather, (2) is mutually exclusive with the others. > > Yes, I have the same background as you, agree and think the focus should be > on (3). > (1) and (2) are maybe not too realistic, but the spec should (1) not be of > the "spaghetti" > kind and it should be relatively easy to learn if you have no problem reading > specs, such > as the DirectX, VST and Audio Unit specs. I'd agree with this too. Being too general just makes things complicated. > Thus the customer audience is the same people who use the above formats BUT I > would like to > add the following group: Linux users. Basically, I think we should focus on > Mac (OS 9 and/or X?), > Windows (all flavours except 3.x) and Linux users (any Linux lurkers here? > Red Hat as a > reference maybe?). There are a few linux people here, its not necceary to target a particular distribution though, internally there all the same. - Steve ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Generalized Music Plugin Interface (GMPI) public discussion list Participation in this list is contingent upon your abiding by the following rules: Please stay on topic. You are responsible for your own words. Please respect your fellow subscribers. Please do not redistribute anyone else's words without their permission. Archive: //www.freelists.org/archives/gmpi Email gmpi-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx w/ subject "unsubscribe" to unsubscribe