On Mon, Dec 29, 2003 at 03:54:57PM -0700, Mike Berry wrote: > I never meant that one gesture could not affect multiple parameters. > In fact it should be able to. However, what I meant by there not being > gesture polyphony was that one parameter could not be simultaneously > part of multiple gestures. I cannot see a good argument for trying to > support that. There is no reason two source could not TRY to do that, but the host should mediate. Some rule is needed like: The host mediates multiple senders to a single receiver. If two senders try to start a gesture at the same time, the host must pick one to allow. If a gesture is in progress for a control and a new gesture is attempted, the new gesture must be determined to have lower or higher priority than the existing gesture (based on the source). Lower priority gestures are not sent to the control. Higher priority gestures are sent to the control, effectively interrupting the existing gesture. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Generalized Music Plugin Interface (GMPI) public discussion list Participation in this list is contingent upon your abiding by the following rules: Please stay on topic. You are responsible for your own words. Please respect your fellow subscribers. Please do not redistribute anyone else's words without their permission. Archive: //www.freelists.org/archives/gmpi Email gmpi-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx w/ subject "unsubscribe" to unsubscribe