[gmpi] Re: Reqs 3.8 Events - gesture start/end
- From: Marc Poirier <fipnid@xxxxxxxxx>
- To: gmpi@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Wed, 24 Dec 2003 09:06:34 -0800 (PST)
--- Steve Harris wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 24, 2003 at 09:50:44 -0700, Mike Berry wrote:
> > >I that sitatuion I would expect the modular GMPI host to handle the
> > >touch automation, and hand pre-merged control data to the sequencer
> > >plugin.
> >
> > What if the modular host does not even record automation and only
> > the sequencer plugin does? If you don't pass down the gesture data,
> > you force all automation to always be handled at the top layer. This
> > would be a significant blow to nestability.
>
> I dont see it that way - either all hosts handle automation, or none do
> (it would be too confusing otherwise). I dont think we want every plugin
> that receives events handling its own automation. Granted the "modular
> GMPI host" is small by host standards, but it should still perform all
> the host functions.
But a plugin can be a host, and also the info is useful for things aside
from automation (like undo, as was mentioned). Anyway, as I just wrote in
another message, I think that the notifications should just be a part of a
smart system where anyone can "tap in" if they want and need to, no need
to make rules about who "shouldn't" be interested in whatever
events/notifications/etc.
Marc
__________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
New Yahoo! Photos - easier uploading and sharing.
http://photos.yahoo.com/
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Generalized Music Plugin Interface (GMPI) public discussion list
Participation in this list is contingent upon your abiding by the
following rules: Please stay on topic. You are responsible for your own
words. Please respect your fellow subscribers. Please do not
redistribute anyone else's words without their permission.
Archive: //www.freelists.org/archives/gmpi
Email gmpi-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx w/ subject "unsubscribe" to unsubscribe
Other related posts:
